Evaluation of thorax computed tomographic findings in COVID-19 variant cases

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Background: Because of genetic mutations occurring during viral replication, new SARS-CoV-2 variants will continue to emerge. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, thorax computed tomographic (CT) findings have played a crucial role in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with COVID-19. In this study, we compared the thorax CT findings of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 variants (variant group) with those of patients infected with the non-variant strain (non-variant group) to assess if thorax CT findings may be utilized to discriminate between the groups. Furthermore, we compared demographic and laboratory data between the groups. Methods: The study comprised a total of 77 patients who presented to our hospital with a preliminary diagnosis of COVID-19 based on clinical symptoms, a positive oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal swab RT-PCR testing, and thorax CT examinations. Patients' laboratory and demographic features as well as thorax CT findings were retrospectively evaluated, and the results were grouped according to RT-PCR results. Results: There were 42 patients in the non-variant group and 35 patients in the variant group. The average age of patients infected with the non-variant strain, alpha variant, and gamma variant was 63.52 ± 14.87 years, 54.86 ± 14.31 years, and 59.4 ± 17.79 years, respectively. The average age of the variant group was significantly lower than that of the non-variant group. There was no significant difference in thorax CT findings between the groups, and consolidation, ground glass densities, and cobblestone pattern in the bilateral lower lobes and peripheral areas were the most common thorax CT findings in both the groups. Conclusion: There is no significant difference in thorax CT findings between the variant and non-variant groups. Therefore, clinical and laboratory characteristics should take precedence over thorax CT findings for distinguishing between patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 variants and the non-variant strain. © 2022

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12602Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorGökharman, F. Dilek
dc.contributor.authorErtem, Günay Tuncer
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Sonay
dc.contributor.authorBüyükdemirci, Ayşe
dc.contributor.authorYüksekkaya, Esra
dc.contributor.authorTokur, Oğuzhan
dc.contributor.authorKoşar, Pınar N.
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:27:29.021536022Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:27:29.021536022Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractBackground: Because of genetic mutations occurring during viral replication, new SARS-CoV-2 variants will continue to emerge. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, thorax computed tomographic (CT) findings have played a crucial role in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with COVID-19. In this study, we compared the thorax CT findings of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 variants (variant group) with those of patients infected with the non-variant strain (non-variant group) to assess if thorax CT findings may be utilized to discriminate between the groups. Furthermore, we compared demographic and laboratory data between the groups. Methods: The study comprised a total of 77 patients who presented to our hospital with a preliminary diagnosis of COVID-19 based on clinical symptoms, a positive oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal swab RT-PCR testing, and thorax CT examinations. Patients' laboratory and demographic features as well as thorax CT findings were retrospectively evaluated, and the results were grouped according to RT-PCR results. Results: There were 42 patients in the non-variant group and 35 patients in the variant group. The average age of patients infected with the non-variant strain, alpha variant, and gamma variant was 63.52 ± 14.87 years, 54.86 ± 14.31 years, and 59.4 ± 17.79 years, respectively. The average age of the variant group was significantly lower than that of the non-variant group. There was no significant difference in thorax CT findings between the groups, and consolidation, ground glass densities, and cobblestone pattern in the bilateral lower lobes and peripheral areas were the most common thorax CT findings in both the groups. Conclusion: There is no significant difference in thorax CT findings between the variant and non-variant groups. Therefore, clinical and laboratory characteristics should take precedence over thorax CT findings for distinguishing between patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 variants and the non-variant strain. © 2022
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.resinv.2021.11.013
dc.identifier.eissn2212-5353
dc.identifier.endpage368
dc.identifier.issn2212-5345
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC8723831
dc.identifier.pmid35000879
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85122630496
dc.identifier.startpage364
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12602
dc.identifier.volume60
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000799992300005
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofRespiratory Investigation
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectPandemic
dc.subjectThorax CT
dc.subjectVariant
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLung
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPandemics
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2
dc.subjectThorax
dc.subjectTomography, X-Ray Computed
dc.subjectC reactive protein
dc.subjectD dimer
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectage
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectcomputer assisted tomography
dc.subjectcoronavirus disease 2019
dc.subjectdemography
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectground glass opacity
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectlaboratory test
dc.subjectleukocyte count
dc.subjectlung consolidation
dc.subjectlung lobe
dc.subjectlymphocyte count
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.titleEvaluation of thorax computed tomographic findings in COVID-19 variant cases
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus3
rdl.citation.wos2
rdl.departmentDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan, Turkey.
rdl.oa.statusgreen
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)