Prediction of geoid undulation using approaches based on GMDH, M5 model tree, MARS, GPR, and IDP

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

This study provides a comprehensive comparison of four different machine learning models including the group method of data handling (GMDH), M5 model tree (M5MT), multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS), and Gaussian process regression (GPR) for predicting geoid undulation. For the first time, GMDH and M5MT were applied for this purpose. The obtained results were also compared with the classic inverse distance to a power (IDP) interpolation method. In order to assess the consistency of our results, two test sites with different topographic features were used for the evaluation of the models. In constructing the models, the geographic coordinate values and the geoid undulation value were used as inputs and output, respectively. Several statistical indices and rank analysis were used for evaluation of the models. According to the comparative results of all models in both test sites, the GMDH yielded the best performance among the developed models. The M5MT also exhibited acceptable results. Thus, it may be concluded that the proposed GMDH and M5MT have the potential to be alternative models that could assist geoscientists working with the geoid. © 2022, Akadémiai Kiadó.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12662Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-022-00378-4Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKonakoglu, Berkant
dc.contributor.authorAkar, Alper
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:27:32.377688702Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:27:32.377688702Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractThis study provides a comprehensive comparison of four different machine learning models including the group method of data handling (GMDH), M5 model tree (M5MT), multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS), and Gaussian process regression (GPR) for predicting geoid undulation. For the first time, GMDH and M5MT were applied for this purpose. The obtained results were also compared with the classic inverse distance to a power (IDP) interpolation method. In order to assess the consistency of our results, two test sites with different topographic features were used for the evaluation of the models. In constructing the models, the geographic coordinate values and the geoid undulation value were used as inputs and output, respectively. Several statistical indices and rank analysis were used for evaluation of the models. According to the comparative results of all models in both test sites, the GMDH yielded the best performance among the developed models. The M5MT also exhibited acceptable results. Thus, it may be concluded that the proposed GMDH and M5MT have the potential to be alternative models that could assist geoscientists working with the geoid. © 2022, Akadémiai Kiadó.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40328-022-00378-4
dc.identifier.eissn2213-5820
dc.identifier.endpage315
dc.identifier.issn2213-5812
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85129341131
dc.identifier.startpage293
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12662
dc.identifier.volume57
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000789708600001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofActa Geodaetica et Geophysica
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectGeoid undulation prediction
dc.subjectInterpolation method
dc.subjectMachine learning models
dc.subjectData handling
dc.subjectForestry
dc.subjectInterpolation
dc.subjectInverse problems
dc.subjectMachine learning
dc.subjectTrees (mathematics)
dc.subjectComprehensive comparisons
dc.subjectGaussian process regression
dc.subjectGeoid undulation
dc.subjectGroup method of data handling
dc.subjectM5 model tree
dc.subjectMultivariate adaptive regression splines
dc.subjectTest site
dc.subjectgeoid
dc.subjectprediction
dc.subjectForecasting
dc.titlePrediction of geoid undulation using approaches based on GMDH, M5 model tree, MARS, GPR, and IDP
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus5
rdl.citation.wos5
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)