Open Abdomen and Fluid Instillation in the Septic Abdomen: Results from the IROA Study

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Background: Open abdomen (OA) is a surgical option that can be used in patients with severe peritonitis. Few evidences exist to recommend the use of intraperitoneal fluid instillation associated with OA in managing septic abdomen. Materials and methods: A prospective analysis of adult patients enrolled in the International Register of Open Abdomen (trial registration: NCT02382770) was performed. Results: A total of 387 patients were enrolled in two groups: 84 with peritoneal fluid instillation (FI) and 303 without (NFI). The groups were homogeneous for baseline characteristics. Overall complications were 92.9% in FI and 86.3% in NFI (p = 0.106). Complications during OA were 72.6% in FI and 59.9% in NFI (p = 0.034). Complications after definitive closure were 70.8% in FI and 61.1% in NFI (p = 0.133). Entero-atmospheric fistula was 13.1% in FI and 12% in NFI (p = 0.828). Fascial closure was 78.6% in FI and 63.7% in NFI (p = 0.02). Analysis of FI in negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) showed: Overall morbidity in NPWT was 94% and in non-NPWT 91.2% (p = 0.622) and morbidity during OA was 68% and 79.4% (p = 0.25), respectively. Definitive fascial closure in NPWT was 87.8% and 96.8% in non-NPWT (p = 0.173). Overall mortality was 40% in NPWT and 29.4% in non-NPWT (p = 0.32) and morality during OA period was 18% and 8.8% (p = 0.238), respectively. Conclusion: We found intraperitoneal fluid instillation during open abdomen in peritonitic patients to increase the complication rate during the open abdomen period, with no impact on mortality, entero-atmospheric fistula rate and opening time. Fascial closure rate is increased by instillation. Fluid instillation is feasible even when associated with nonnegative pressure temporary abdominal closure techniques. © 2020, The Author(s).

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13030Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05728-3Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorCoccolini, Federico
dc.contributor.authorGubbiotti, Francesca
dc.contributor.authorCeresoli, Marco
dc.contributor.authorTartaglia, Dario
dc.contributor.authorFugazzola, Paola
dc.contributor.authorAnsaloni, Luca
dc.contributor.authorSartelli, Massimo
dc.contributor.authorKluger, Yoram
dc.contributor.authorKirkpatrick, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorAmico, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorCatena, Fausto
dc.contributor.authorChiarugi, Massimo
dc.contributor.authorMontori, Giulia
dc.contributor.authorSalvetti, Fracensco
dc.contributor.authorNegoi, Ionut
dc.contributor.authorZese, Monica
dc.contributor.authorOcchionorelli, Savino
dc.contributor.authorShlyapnikov, Sergei
dc.contributor.authorSugrue, Michael
dc.contributor.authorDemetrashvili, Zaza
dc.contributor.authorDondossola, Daniele
dc.contributor.authorIoannidis, Orestis
dc.contributor.authorNovelli, Giuseppe
dc.contributor.authorNacoti, Mirco
dc.contributor.authorKhor, Desmond
dc.contributor.authorInaba, Kenji
dc.contributor.authorDemetriades, Demetrios
dc.contributor.authorKaussen, Torsten
dc.contributor.authorJusoh, AsriChe
dc.contributor.authorGhannam, Wagih
dc.contributor.authorSakakushev, Boris
dc.contributor.authorGuetta, Ohad
dc.contributor.authorDogjani, Agron
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Stefano
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Sandeep
dc.contributor.authorDamaskos, Dimitrios
dc.contributor.authorIsik, Arda
dc.contributor.authorYuan, Kuo-Ching
dc.contributor.authorTrotta, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorRausei, Stefano
dc.contributor.authorMartinez-Perez, Aleix
dc.contributor.authorBellanova, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorFonseca, ViniciusCordeiro
dc.contributor.authorHernández, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorMarinis, Athanasios
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Wellington
dc.contributor.authorQuiodettis, Martha
dc.contributor.authorBala, Miklosh
dc.contributor.authorVereczkei, Andras
dc.contributor.authorCurado, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorFraga, GustavoPereira
dc.contributor.authorPereira, BrunoM
dc.contributor.authorGachabayov, Mahir
dc.contributor.authorChagerben, GuillermoPerez
dc.contributor.authorArellano, MiguelLeon
dc.contributor.authorOzyazici, Sefa
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Gianluca
dc.contributor.authorTezcaner, Tugan
dc.contributor.authorPorta, Matteo
dc.contributor.authorLi, Yousheng
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:27:52.432443735Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:27:52.432443735Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractBackground: Open abdomen (OA) is a surgical option that can be used in patients with severe peritonitis. Few evidences exist to recommend the use of intraperitoneal fluid instillation associated with OA in managing septic abdomen. Materials and methods: A prospective analysis of adult patients enrolled in the International Register of Open Abdomen (trial registration: NCT02382770) was performed. Results: A total of 387 patients were enrolled in two groups: 84 with peritoneal fluid instillation (FI) and 303 without (NFI). The groups were homogeneous for baseline characteristics. Overall complications were 92.9% in FI and 86.3% in NFI (p = 0.106). Complications during OA were 72.6% in FI and 59.9% in NFI (p = 0.034). Complications after definitive closure were 70.8% in FI and 61.1% in NFI (p = 0.133). Entero-atmospheric fistula was 13.1% in FI and 12% in NFI (p = 0.828). Fascial closure was 78.6% in FI and 63.7% in NFI (p = 0.02). Analysis of FI in negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) showed: Overall morbidity in NPWT was 94% and in non-NPWT 91.2% (p = 0.622) and morbidity during OA was 68% and 79.4% (p = 0.25), respectively. Definitive fascial closure in NPWT was 87.8% and 96.8% in non-NPWT (p = 0.173). Overall mortality was 40% in NPWT and 29.4% in non-NPWT (p = 0.32) and morality during OA period was 18% and 8.8% (p = 0.238), respectively. Conclusion: We found intraperitoneal fluid instillation during open abdomen in peritonitic patients to increase the complication rate during the open abdomen period, with no impact on mortality, entero-atmospheric fistula rate and opening time. Fascial closure rate is increased by instillation. Fluid instillation is feasible even when associated with nonnegative pressure temporary abdominal closure techniques. © 2020, The Author(s).
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen access funding provided by Università di Pisa within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. Acknowledgments
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00268-020-05728-3
dc.identifier.endpage4040
dc.identifier.issn0364-2313
dc.identifier.issue12
dc.identifier.pmid32833107
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85089729938
dc.identifier.startpage4032
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13030
dc.identifier.volume44
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Journal of Surgery
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAbdomen
dc.subjectAbdominal Cavity
dc.subjectAbdominal Wound Closure Techniques
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectDigestive System Surgical Procedures
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFluid Therapy
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectNegative-Pressure Wound Therapy
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectSepsis
dc.subjectSurgical Wound Infection
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectabdominal surgery
dc.subjectabdominal wound closure
dc.subjectcomplication
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectprospective study
dc.subjectsurgery
dc.subjectsurgical infection
dc.subjectvacuum assisted closure
dc.titleOpen Abdomen and Fluid Instillation in the Septic Abdomen: Results from the IROA Study
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus13
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS