DENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND MICROLEAKAGE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES; [Üç Farklı Üniversal Adeziv Sistemin Dentine Makaslama Bağlanma Dayanımlarının ve Mikrosızıntı Değerlerinin Karşılaştırılması]

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the bond strength and micro-leakage of three different universal adhesive systems applied in self-etch mode to dentin. Materials and Methods: To evaluate bond strength, the mid-coronal dentin surfaces of forty-five human molar teeth were exposed and randomly assigned into three groups according to the following adhesive application: Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE), Optibond XTR (Kerr), and Tokuyama Universal (Tokuyama Dental) (n=15). The shear bond strength test was performed after composite build-up. Then, the fractured surfaces were evaluated using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). To evaluate micro-leakage, facial class V cavities were prepared to forty-five human premolars and randomly assigned into identical three experimental groups described above (n=15). After composite resin restoration of cavities, the specimens were thermo-cycled for 500 cycles and then immersed in basic fuchsine, sectioned, and examined under a stereo-microscope. Data were evaluated using one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s, Chi-square and Mann Whitney U tests. Results: Among the adhesives, the highest bond strength was achieved in Optibond XTR, while Tokuyama Universal showed the lowest bond strength values (p<0.05). In micro-leakage results, no significant difference was reported in occlusal margins among groups. In gingival margins, Optibond XTR showed less leakage compared to Tokuyama and Single Bond Universal (p<0.05). Conclusions: The study findings indicated that two-step universal adhesive system is more successful than one-step universal adhesive systems in bonding to dentin. Considering that bonding plays a major role in the longevity of the restoration, it can be said that the use of two-step universal adhesive systems in dentin can give more successful results. © 2021, Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. All Rights Reserved.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13169Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.747021Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorÖzkanoğlu, Seda
dc.contributor.authorAkin, Emine Gülşah Göktolga
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:28:00.601571947Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:28:00.601571947Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the bond strength and micro-leakage of three different universal adhesive systems applied in self-etch mode to dentin. Materials and Methods: To evaluate bond strength, the mid-coronal dentin surfaces of forty-five human molar teeth were exposed and randomly assigned into three groups according to the following adhesive application: Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE), Optibond XTR (Kerr), and Tokuyama Universal (Tokuyama Dental) (n=15). The shear bond strength test was performed after composite build-up. Then, the fractured surfaces were evaluated using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). To evaluate micro-leakage, facial class V cavities were prepared to forty-five human premolars and randomly assigned into identical three experimental groups described above (n=15). After composite resin restoration of cavities, the specimens were thermo-cycled for 500 cycles and then immersed in basic fuchsine, sectioned, and examined under a stereo-microscope. Data were evaluated using one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s, Chi-square and Mann Whitney U tests. Results: Among the adhesives, the highest bond strength was achieved in Optibond XTR, while Tokuyama Universal showed the lowest bond strength values (p<0.05). In micro-leakage results, no significant difference was reported in occlusal margins among groups. In gingival margins, Optibond XTR showed less leakage compared to Tokuyama and Single Bond Universal (p<0.05). Conclusions: The study findings indicated that two-step universal adhesive system is more successful than one-step universal adhesive systems in bonding to dentin. Considering that bonding plays a major role in the longevity of the restoration, it can be said that the use of two-step universal adhesive systems in dentin can give more successful results. © 2021, Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. All Rights Reserved.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by Sivas Cumhuriyet University Scientific Research Projects under project code DIS-215.
dc.identifier.doi10.7126/cumudj.747021
dc.identifier.eissn2146-2852
dc.identifier.endpage20
dc.identifier.issn2146-2852
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85143854408
dc.identifier.startpage10
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13169
dc.identifier.volume24
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry
dc.relation.ispartofCumhuriyet Dental Journal
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAdhesive systems
dc.subjectDentin bond strength
dc.subjectMicro-leakage
dc.titleDENTIN BOND STRENGTH AND MICROLEAKAGE COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL ADHESIVES; [Üç Farklı Üniversal Adeziv Sistemin Dentine Makaslama Bağlanma Dayanımlarının ve Mikrosızıntı Değerlerinin Karşılaştırılması]
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus4
rdl.citation.trdizin1
rdl.departmentERZİNCAN BİNALİ YILDIRIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.departmentSAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN