Tracking neonicotinoids following their use as cotton seed treatments

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Neonicotinoids are a leading class of insecticides on the global market, accounting for nearly 25%. They are widely used in both agricultural and residential settings. Causing neuron failure by irreversibly binding to the insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, neonicotinoids offer broad spectrum efficacy against a variety of pests. However, because they are non-selective with regard to insect species, there has been some concern with neonicotinoid use over threats to pollinators such as honeybees, and potential indirect effects to migratory waterfowl as a result of invertebrate prey population depletion. In order to study occurrence and fate of neonicotinoids (thiamethoxam and imidacloprid), we analyzed cotton leaves on plants grown from neonicotinoid-treated seeds and corresponding soil samples between cotton rows. Neonicotinoid concentration data from cotton leaves appears to be consistent with the claim that seed treatments protect plants for 3–4 weeks; by 30 days post-planting, neonicotinoid concentrations fell, in general, to 200 ng/g or lower. This represents about a 10-fold decrease from plant concentrations at approximately 2 weeks post-planting. It was found that neonicotinoids used as seed treatments remained present in the soil for months post planting and could be available for runoff. To that end, 21 playa wetlands were sampled; 10 had at least one quantifiable neonicotinoid present, three of which were classified as grassland or rangeland playas, two were urban, and the remaining five were cropland playas. In several instances, neonicotinoid concentrations in playas exceeded EPA chronic benchmarks for aquatic invertebrates. Copyright 2019 Kohl et al.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/14307Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6805Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKohl, Kristina L.
dc.contributor.authorHarrell, Lauren K.
dc.contributor.authorMudge, Joseph F.
dc.contributor.authorSubbiah, Seenivasan
dc.contributor.authorKasumba, John
dc.contributor.authorOsma, Etem
dc.contributor.authorBarman, Apurba K.
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Todd A.
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:29:06.713869055Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:29:06.713869055Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractNeonicotinoids are a leading class of insecticides on the global market, accounting for nearly 25%. They are widely used in both agricultural and residential settings. Causing neuron failure by irreversibly binding to the insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, neonicotinoids offer broad spectrum efficacy against a variety of pests. However, because they are non-selective with regard to insect species, there has been some concern with neonicotinoid use over threats to pollinators such as honeybees, and potential indirect effects to migratory waterfowl as a result of invertebrate prey population depletion. In order to study occurrence and fate of neonicotinoids (thiamethoxam and imidacloprid), we analyzed cotton leaves on plants grown from neonicotinoid-treated seeds and corresponding soil samples between cotton rows. Neonicotinoid concentration data from cotton leaves appears to be consistent with the claim that seed treatments protect plants for 3–4 weeks; by 30 days post-planting, neonicotinoid concentrations fell, in general, to 200 ng/g or lower. This represents about a 10-fold decrease from plant concentrations at approximately 2 weeks post-planting. It was found that neonicotinoids used as seed treatments remained present in the soil for months post planting and could be available for runoff. To that end, 21 playa wetlands were sampled; 10 had at least one quantifiable neonicotinoid present, three of which were classified as grassland or rangeland playas, two were urban, and the remaining five were cropland playas. In several instances, neonicotinoid concentrations in playas exceeded EPA chronic benchmarks for aquatic invertebrates. Copyright 2019 Kohl et al.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported in part by Cotton Incorporated CORE funding to Dr. Apurba Barman and Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
dc.identifier.doi10.7717/peerj.6805
dc.identifier.issn2167-8359
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC6476295
dc.identifier.pmid31041156
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85071699616
dc.identifier.startpagee6805
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/14307
dc.identifier.volume7
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPeerJ Inc.
dc.relation.ispartofPeerJ
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectClothianidin
dc.subjectEnvironmental fate
dc.subjectImidacloprid
dc.subjectPlant uptake
dc.subjectPlaya wetland
dc.subjectRunoff
dc.subjectThiamethoxam
dc.subjectinsecticide
dc.subjectneonicotinoid
dc.subjectnicotinic receptor
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectbiomass production
dc.subjectcotton seed treatment
dc.subjectdry weight
dc.subjectGossypium
dc.subjecthigh performance liquid chromatography
dc.subjectliquid chromatography-mass spectrometry
dc.subjectmedicinal plant
dc.subjectnonhuman
dc.subjectparticle size
dc.subjectplant growth
dc.subjectplant seed
dc.subjectquality control
dc.subjectsampling
dc.subjectsoil
dc.subjectsoil treatment
dc.subjectsolid phase extraction
dc.subjectwetland
dc.titleTracking neonicotinoids following their use as cotton seed treatments
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus16
rdl.departmentBiology Department, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan, Erzincan Province, Turkey.
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED