The Rotation Forest algorithm and object-based classification method for land use mapping through UAV images

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

This study aims to test the performance of the Rotation Forest (RTF) algorithm in urban and rural areas that have similar characteristics using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) images to produce the most up-to-date and accurate land use maps. The performance of the RTF algorithm was compared to other ensemble methods such as Random Forest (RF) and Gentle AdaBoost (GAB) for object-based classification. RGB bands and other variables (i.e. ratio, mean, standard deviation,.. etc.) were also used in classification. The accuracy assessments showed that the RTF method, with 92.52 and 91.29% accuracies, performed better than the RF (2 and 4%) and GAB (5 and 8%) methods in urban and rural areas, respectively. The significance of differences in classification methods was also analysed using the McNemar test. Consequently, this study shows the success of the RTF algorithm in the object-based classification of UAV images for land use mapping. © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/14333Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorAkar, Özlem
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:29:08.097208716Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:29:08.097208716Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to test the performance of the Rotation Forest (RTF) algorithm in urban and rural areas that have similar characteristics using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) images to produce the most up-to-date and accurate land use maps. The performance of the RTF algorithm was compared to other ensemble methods such as Random Forest (RF) and Gentle AdaBoost (GAB) for object-based classification. RGB bands and other variables (i.e. ratio, mean, standard deviation,.. etc.) were also used in classification. The accuracy assessments showed that the RTF method, with 92.52 and 91.29% accuracies, performed better than the RF (2 and 4%) and GAB (5 and 8%) methods in urban and rural areas, respectively. The significance of differences in classification methods was also analysed using the McNemar test. Consequently, this study shows the success of the RTF algorithm in the object-based classification of UAV images for land use mapping. © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10106049.2016.1277273
dc.identifier.eissn1752-0762
dc.identifier.endpage553
dc.identifier.issn1010-6049
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85008659699
dc.identifier.startpage538
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/14333
dc.identifier.volume33
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000427851500007
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd.
dc.relation.ispartofGeocarto International
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectclassification
dc.subjectMcNemar test
dc.subjectRandom Forest
dc.subjectRotation Forest
dc.subjectunmanned aerial vehicle
dc.subjectaccuracy assessment
dc.subjectaerial photograph
dc.subjectalgorithm
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectGIS
dc.subjectland use
dc.subjectunmanned vehicle
dc.subjectvegetation mapping
dc.titleThe Rotation Forest algorithm and object-based classification method for land use mapping through UAV images
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus33
rdl.citation.wos26
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)