Education and Visual Information Improves Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Local Injections on Shoulder Pain and Associated Anxiety Level: A Randomized Controlled Study

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Objective Local injections are widely used in patients with a painful shoulder. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible impact of patients' visual information on the effectiveness of ultrasound (US)-guided local injections on anxiety levels and shoulder pain. Design A total of 151 patients, scheduled for local injection owing to shoulder pain, were randomly assigned into two groups in a consecutive order. Patients in group I (n = 72) were provided information related to US findings and allowed to watch the procedures from the monitor, whereas patients in group II (n = 79) received the injection only without any collaboration. Data were collected from both groups immediately before and after injections through visual analog scale and questionnaire (the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI] forms 1 and 2). Results US-guided local injections provided significant improvement of anxiety and pain in both groups, irrespective of providing visual information. Group I and group II comparisons with respect to the visual analog scale, STAI 1, and STAI 2 yielded significant difference only for postinjection STAI 2 in group I (P = 0.006). Intragroup comparisons revealed significant differences between preinjection and postinjection values (group I: visual analog scale, P = 0.001; STAI form 1, P = 0.001; STAI form 2, P = 0.002; group II: visual analog scale, P = 0.001; STAI form 1, P = 0.002; STAI form 2, P = 0.042). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of postinjection satisfaction levels from the procedures (P = 0.824). Conclusions Performing US-guided shoulder injections with patient visual information provides positive contributions to coping with pain and anxiety. In particular, the patient collaboration-based US-guided injections have positive consequences on patients' long-standing "trait-anxiety" levels. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/15435Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKarkucak, Murat
dc.contributor.authorCilesizoglu, Nurce
dc.contributor.authorCapkin, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorCan, Ipek
dc.contributor.authorBatmaz, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorKerimoglu, Servet
dc.contributor.authorOnder, Mustafa Avni
dc.contributor.authorKaraca, Adem
dc.contributor.authorAyar, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:30:16.581151659Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:30:16.581151659Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractObjective Local injections are widely used in patients with a painful shoulder. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible impact of patients' visual information on the effectiveness of ultrasound (US)-guided local injections on anxiety levels and shoulder pain. Design A total of 151 patients, scheduled for local injection owing to shoulder pain, were randomly assigned into two groups in a consecutive order. Patients in group I (n = 72) were provided information related to US findings and allowed to watch the procedures from the monitor, whereas patients in group II (n = 79) received the injection only without any collaboration. Data were collected from both groups immediately before and after injections through visual analog scale and questionnaire (the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI] forms 1 and 2). Results US-guided local injections provided significant improvement of anxiety and pain in both groups, irrespective of providing visual information. Group I and group II comparisons with respect to the visual analog scale, STAI 1, and STAI 2 yielded significant difference only for postinjection STAI 2 in group I (P = 0.006). Intragroup comparisons revealed significant differences between preinjection and postinjection values (group I: visual analog scale, P = 0.001; STAI form 1, P = 0.001; STAI form 2, P = 0.002; group II: visual analog scale, P = 0.001; STAI form 1, P = 0.002; STAI form 2, P = 0.042). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of postinjection satisfaction levels from the procedures (P = 0.824). Conclusions Performing US-guided shoulder injections with patient visual information provides positive contributions to coping with pain and anxiety. In particular, the patient collaboration-based US-guided injections have positive consequences on patients' long-standing "trait-anxiety" levels. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/phm.0000000000000305
dc.identifier.eissn1537-7385
dc.identifier.endpage14
dc.identifier.issn0894-9115
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid25888661
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84951185273
dc.identifier.startpage9
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/15435
dc.identifier.volume95
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000366818100002
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAnxiety
dc.subjectEducation and Visual Information
dc.subjectLocal Injection
dc.subjectPatient Collaboration
dc.subjectShoulder Pain
dc.subjectUltrasound
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInjections, Intra-Articular
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPain
dc.subjectPatient Education as Topic
dc.subjectPatient Satisfaction
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectUltrasonography, Interventional
dc.subjectVisual Analog Scale
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdevices
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinterventional ultrasonography
dc.subjectintraarticular drug administration
dc.subjectpatient education
dc.subjectprevention and control
dc.subjectprospective study
dc.subjectpsychology
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial
dc.titleEducation and Visual Information Improves Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Local Injections on Shoulder Pain and Associated Anxiety Level: A Randomized Controlled Study
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus13
rdl.citation.wos10
rdl.departmentFrom the Division of Rheumatology, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical School, Farabi Hospital, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey (MK, EC)
rdl.departmentDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical School, Farabi Hospital, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey (NC, IC)
rdl.departmentDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dıcle University Medical School, Diyarbakır, Turkey (IB)
rdl.departmentDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical School, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey (SK, MAO)
rdl.departmentDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Erzincan University Medical School, Erzincan, Turkey (AK)
rdl.departmentand Department of Physiology, Medical School, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey (AA).
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)