Prediction Level of Physical Education Teachers' Interpersonal Self-Efficacy Levels on Their Time Management

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

In this study, it was aimed to determine the prediction level of physical education and sports teachers' interpersonal self-efficacy levels on their time management. For this purpose, data were collected from 220 physical education and sports teachers, 94 of whom were female and 126 were male, working in the city of Batman in the academic year 2019-2020. While 133 of the teachers, whose data were collected, work as permanent teachers, 87 of them work as contracted, substitute or paid teachers. Physical Education Teachers' Interpersonal Self-Efficacy Scale and Time Management Inventory were used as data collection tools. The Physical Education Teachers' Interpersonal Self-Efficacy Scale was developed by Esentiirk et al., consisting of 32 items and three sub-dimensions that are In-School Relationships (ISR), Family Relationships (FR) and Environmental Relationships (ER). The Time Management Inventory developed by Britton and Tassser was adapted to Turkish by Alay and Kocak, and it was arranged by Gozel to be applied to primary education teachers. There are three sub-dimensions of Inventory: Time Planning (TP), Time Attitudes (TA) and Time Wasters (TW). The calculated reliability coefficients show that the data collected regarding the subscales are reliable enough. In the analysis process of the study, stepwise regression analysis was made based on the data related to the sub-dimensions of both scales, and the variables that seem to have not contributed to the model after the analysis were removed from the model. It was determined that ER scores of physical education and sports teachers were a significant predictor of TP scores, but ISR and FR scores were not a significant predictor of TP scores. In addition, it was understood that FR scores and ISR scores of physical education and sports teachers were not a significant predictor of TA, besides, ER scores significantly predicted TA, but the level of prediction was low. On the other hand, it was understood that the ISR score of physical education and sports teachers significantly predicted the TW score, while the other two variables, FR and ER, had no effect on the TW score. these results, some suggestions were given.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/16226Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorArtunc, Mesut
dc.contributor.authorYazici, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:33:43.173153488Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:33:43.173153488Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractIn this study, it was aimed to determine the prediction level of physical education and sports teachers' interpersonal self-efficacy levels on their time management. For this purpose, data were collected from 220 physical education and sports teachers, 94 of whom were female and 126 were male, working in the city of Batman in the academic year 2019-2020. While 133 of the teachers, whose data were collected, work as permanent teachers, 87 of them work as contracted, substitute or paid teachers. Physical Education Teachers' Interpersonal Self-Efficacy Scale and Time Management Inventory were used as data collection tools. The Physical Education Teachers' Interpersonal Self-Efficacy Scale was developed by Esentiirk et al., consisting of 32 items and three sub-dimensions that are In-School Relationships (ISR), Family Relationships (FR) and Environmental Relationships (ER). The Time Management Inventory developed by Britton and Tassser was adapted to Turkish by Alay and Kocak, and it was arranged by Gozel to be applied to primary education teachers. There are three sub-dimensions of Inventory: Time Planning (TP), Time Attitudes (TA) and Time Wasters (TW). The calculated reliability coefficients show that the data collected regarding the subscales are reliable enough. In the analysis process of the study, stepwise regression analysis was made based on the data related to the sub-dimensions of both scales, and the variables that seem to have not contributed to the model after the analysis were removed from the model. It was determined that ER scores of physical education and sports teachers were a significant predictor of TP scores, but ISR and FR scores were not a significant predictor of TP scores. In addition, it was understood that FR scores and ISR scores of physical education and sports teachers were not a significant predictor of TA, besides, ER scores significantly predicted TA, but the level of prediction was low. On the other hand, it was understood that the ISR score of physical education and sports teachers significantly predicted the TW score, while the other two variables, FR and ER, had no effect on the TW score. these results, some suggestions were given.
dc.identifier.endpage67
dc.identifier.issn2322-3537
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.startpage61
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/16226
dc.identifier.volume9
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000573283800008
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherINT JOURNAL APPLIED EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY
dc.relation.ispartofINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectPhysical Education
dc.subjectInterpersonal Self-Efficacy
dc.subjectTeacher
dc.subjectTime Management
dc.subjectSport Sciences
dc.titlePrediction Level of Physical Education Teachers' Interpersonal Self-Efficacy Levels on Their Time Management
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)