Diagnostic Comparison of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy and Systematic Biopsy in PI-RADS 4-5 Prostate Lesions

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Objective: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has transformed prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis by enabling lesion-targeted biopsies. The optimal biopsy approach—systematic biopsy (SB), MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy (TB), or their combination (CB)—remains debated, especially in patients with high-risk Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4-5 lesions. This study compared these strategies for detecting overall and csPCa. Methods: This retrospective study included 330 patients who underwent MRI-ultrasound fusion TB with 12-core SB between July 2022 and May 2025. Only lesions classified as PI-RADS v2.1 category 4 or 5 were analyzed. Detection rates of overall PCa and csPCa (Gleason score ≥ 7) were compared among SB, TB, and CB. Subgroup analyses were performed by PI-RADS category and lesion location (anterior, middle, posterior). Logistic regression identified independent predictors of csPCa. Results: A total of 429 lesions were evaluated. Overall, PCa detection rates were 62% for SB, 70% for TB, and 77% for CB (P < 0.001); the corresponding csPCa rates were 47%, 56%, and 63% (P < 0.001). TB detected csPCa more effectively than SB (56% vs. 47%, P < 0.01). PI-RADS 5 lesions had higher detection rates than PI-RADS 4 lesions across all methods. CB achieved the highest rates in all locations, especially in anterior and middle lesions. Age, positive digital rectal examination, prostate-specific antigen density, prior biopsy, and PI-RADS category 5 were independent predictors of csPCa. Conclusion: In PI-RADS 4–5 lesions, combined SB and TB provide the highest detection rate for csPCa. While TB improves selective detection, SB remains essential to avoid missing significant disease.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/17143Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4274/abcr.2026.26420Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorlevent, akın
dc.contributor.authorDURMAZ, ÖNDER
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:49:20.918256302Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:49:20.918256302Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractObjective: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has transformed prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis by enabling lesion-targeted biopsies. The optimal biopsy approach—systematic biopsy (SB), MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy (TB), or their combination (CB)—remains debated, especially in patients with high-risk Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4-5 lesions. This study compared these strategies for detecting overall and csPCa. Methods: This retrospective study included 330 patients who underwent MRI-ultrasound fusion TB with 12-core SB between July 2022 and May 2025. Only lesions classified as PI-RADS v2.1 category 4 or 5 were analyzed. Detection rates of overall PCa and csPCa (Gleason score ≥ 7) were compared among SB, TB, and CB. Subgroup analyses were performed by PI-RADS category and lesion location (anterior, middle, posterior). Logistic regression identified independent predictors of csPCa. Results: A total of 429 lesions were evaluated. Overall, PCa detection rates were 62% for SB, 70% for TB, and 77% for CB (P < 0.001); the corresponding csPCa rates were 47%, 56%, and 63% (P < 0.001). TB detected csPCa more effectively than SB (56% vs. 47%, P < 0.01). PI-RADS 5 lesions had higher detection rates than PI-RADS 4 lesions across all methods. CB achieved the highest rates in all locations, especially in anterior and middle lesions. Age, positive digital rectal examination, prostate-specific antigen density, prior biopsy, and PI-RADS category 5 were independent predictors of csPCa. Conclusion: In PI-RADS 4–5 lesions, combined SB and TB provide the highest detection rate for csPCa. While TB improves selective detection, SB remains essential to avoid missing significant disease.
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/abcr.2026.26420
dc.identifier.eissn2687-4482
dc.identifier.endpage128
dc.identifier.issn2687-4520
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage120
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/17143
dc.identifier.volume8
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Basic and Clinical Research
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectÜroloji ve Nefroloji
dc.subjectRadyoloji
dc.subjectNükleer Tıp
dc.subjectTıbbi Görüntüleme
dc.titleDiagnostic Comparison of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy and Systematic Biopsy in PI-RADS 4-5 Prostate Lesions
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.trdizin0
rdl.departmentERZİNCAN BİNALİ YILDIRIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN