Heterogeneous Effects of Green Technology Innovations on Renewable Energy Supply Share: A Dynamic Panel Evidence

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

This study examines the determinants of renewable energy efficiency (REE) in a balanced panel of 17 countries (1995–2021), focusing on green technology innovations (GTI), economic growth (EG), and energy taxation (ET). The analysis accounts for heterogeneity, common shocks, and dynamic adjustment by combining two-way fixed effects with dependence-robust and dynamic common correlated effects (CCE) estimators using Driscoll–Kraay inference. The results show strong persistence in REE and a robust positive association between GTI and REE in the preferred common-factor framework, while the average effects of EG and ET are weaker and model-sensitive. Dumitrescu–Hurlin panel causality tests indicate feedback between REE and EG and bidirectional linkages between REE and ET at the level, whereas innovation dynamics are asymmetric. Overall, the evidences support innovation-centered transition strategies and emphasizes evaluating policy instruments over multi-year horizons given strong persistence and cross-country heterogeneity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/17146Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58559/ijes.1886582Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorBALKAR, Oğuz Emre
dc.contributor.authorÖZENOĞLU, Yunus Emre
dc.contributor.authorALKAN, OKAN
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:49:21.048287146Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:49:21.048287146Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the determinants of renewable energy efficiency (REE) in a balanced panel of 17 countries (1995–2021), focusing on green technology innovations (GTI), economic growth (EG), and energy taxation (ET). The analysis accounts for heterogeneity, common shocks, and dynamic adjustment by combining two-way fixed effects with dependence-robust and dynamic common correlated effects (CCE) estimators using Driscoll–Kraay inference. The results show strong persistence in REE and a robust positive association between GTI and REE in the preferred common-factor framework, while the average effects of EG and ET are weaker and model-sensitive. Dumitrescu–Hurlin panel causality tests indicate feedback between REE and EG and bidirectional linkages between REE and ET at the level, whereas innovation dynamics are asymmetric. Overall, the evidences support innovation-centered transition strategies and emphasizes evaluating policy instruments over multi-year horizons given strong persistence and cross-country heterogeneity.
dc.identifier.doi10.58559/ijes.1886582
dc.identifier.eissn2717-7513
dc.identifier.endpage1062
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage1033
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/17146
dc.identifier.volume11
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofInternational journal of energy studies (Online)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectYeşil
dc.subjectSürdürülebilir Bilim ve Teknoloji
dc.subjectEnerji ve Yakıtlar
dc.subjectİktisat
dc.titleHeterogeneous Effects of Green Technology Innovations on Renewable Energy Supply Share: A Dynamic Panel Evidence
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.trdizin0
rdl.departmentERZİNCAN BİNALİ YILDIRIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.departmentATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN