Paucity of Consumer Redress Actions: A Critical Appraisal in Light of the Damages Directive for Competition Infringements

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

The studies carried out for and by the European Commission have demonstrated that one group of victims harmed bycompetition infringements, i.e. consumers, have never or rarely claimed compensation. This gave rise to an ongoingwork in the EU to enhance private competition law enforcement and to raise awareness among victims for over adecade. In 2014, the European Commission’s work on the enhancement of private competition law enforcementhas led to the publication of ‘The Directive on Certain Rules Governing Actions for Damages Under National Lawfor Infringements of the Competition Law Provisions of the Member States and of the European Union’. The articleaims to show that the Directive has failed to address the main issues resulting to the paucity of consumer damagesclaims, and therefore argues that the Directive falls short of providing necessary means to compensate consumers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/20156Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorSahin-Sengul, Eda
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T21:12:03.226070986Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T21:12:03.226070986Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThe studies carried out for and by the European Commission have demonstrated that one group of victims harmed bycompetition infringements, i.e. consumers, have never or rarely claimed compensation. This gave rise to an ongoingwork in the EU to enhance private competition law enforcement and to raise awareness among victims for over adecade. In 2014, the European Commission’s work on the enhancement of private competition law enforcementhas led to the publication of ‘The Directive on Certain Rules Governing Actions for Damages Under National Lawfor Infringements of the Competition Law Provisions of the Member States and of the European Union’. The articleaims to show that the Directive has failed to address the main issues resulting to the paucity of consumer damagesclaims, and therefore argues that the Directive falls short of providing necessary means to compensate consumers.
dc.identifier.endpage195
dc.identifier.issn2458-8202
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage169
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/20156
dc.identifier.volume3
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofÇankaya Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectKriminoloji ve Ceza Bilimi
dc.subjectKamu Yönetimi
dc.subjectHukuk
dc.subjectİktisat
dc.subjectUluslararası İlişkiler
dc.titlePaucity of Consumer Redress Actions: A Critical Appraisal in Light of the Damages Directive for Competition Infringements
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.trdizin0
rdl.departmentERZİNCAN BİNALİ YILDIRIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN