Kasımoğlu, Necla; Aydın, Muhammet Ali; Tuncay, Birgül; Gürol, Ayşe; Adıyaman, Abdullah

Objectives: This study aimed to translate the Needs of Parents Caring for Children with Epilepsy Questionnaire (NPCEQ) into Turkish (NPCEQ-TR) and evaluate its psychometric properties, including validity and reliability, within a Turkish cultural context. Methods: A cross-sectional and methodological design was employed. Data were collected online from 310 parents of children with epilepsy in 2025. The adaptation process followed international guidelines and included translation, back-translation, content validation, and pilot testing. Construct validity was examined through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega coefficients. Results: The content validity indices were satisfactory (I-CVI = 0.80– 1.00; S-CVI = 0.91). The KMO value (0.952) and Bartlett’s test (χ² = 5173.501, p < .001) confirmed that the data were suitable for factor analysis. CFA supported the original five-factor structure, with fit indices indicating an excellent model fit (χ²/df = 1.27; CFI = 0.976; TLI = 0.974; RMSEA = 0.030). Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega coefficients ranged from 0.770 to 0.930 for the subscales, and were 0.958 and 0.950, respectively, for the total scale. Conclusion: The NPCEQ-TR demonstrated strong construct validity, high internal consistency, and cultural relevance. It is a reliable and practical instrument for assessing the multidimensional needs of parents caring for children with epilepsy, and it can be utilized effectively in family-centered nursing and psychosocial interventions in Turkey.

Ersoy, Alevtina; Baloglu, Senanur; Tanoglu, Ceyda; Hayme, Serhat

Background & Objective: Cognitive impairment is common in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). The Framingham Risk Score (FRS) is an algorithm used to estimate the 10-year risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVDr). This study aimed to evaluate the possible associations between FRS and cognitive impairment in people with MS. Methods: Demographic characteristics, laboratory parameters, clinical findings, vascular risk factors, and Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) test results, FRS and CVDr scores were recorded for 110 MS patients. Results: FRS and CVDr scores exhibited a significant negative correlation with the number of correct responses in the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (p < 0.001 for all) and California Verbal Learning Test–Second UK Edition (CVLT-II) test (p < 0.001 for all), and significant positive correlation with the number of incorrect responses in the CVLT-II (p < 0.001 for all). The total score of the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test Revised had a negative correlation with FRS and CVDr (p < 0.001 for both). BICAMS scores showed no significant correlation with smoking status, homocysteine, and uric acid levels. Conclusion: We suppose that vascular risk factors and FRS and CVDr scores may be associated with the deterioration of working memory, information processing speed, verbal learning, and memory in people with MS. Based on the potential impact of vascular risk factors on cognitive functions, our findings suggest that lifestyle changes, appropriate treatment, and using a multidisciplinary approach toward vascular risk factors during MS management may exhibit a positive effect on cognition in people with MS.