Bu dergideki yayınlar

2 →
  • ArticleAçık Erişim2026
    Adaptation of the Systematic Assessment of Book Reading Tool (SABR-2.2) into Turkish

    Sahin, Figen; Benli, Gokce Karaman; Teke, Nergiz; Yilmaz, Arif; Demir, Ergul; Kinik, Elif Kural; Bad, Tugba

    This study aims to adapt SABR-2.2 to the Turkish language and culture. The tool was developed to evaluate the quality of preschool teachers' book-reading activities with children. The adaptation of the SABR-2.2 was conducted in line with the theoretical and practical models and criteria. A total of 150 volunteer preschool teachers employed in preschools and kindergartens in Ankara participated in the study. According to the results, the factor loadings for 11 items ranged from .40 to .83, accounted for 46% of the total variance, and indicated a unidimensional structure. The goodness-of-fit indices obtained from the confirmatory analyses (chi 2/df indicated an acceptable to good level of model-data fit. For the 11-item scale, Cronbach's alpha was .81, and McDonald's omega was .90. These values indicate that the scale works with high internal consistency. In addition, the total scores obtained from the scale seem to provide high discrimination between the lower and upper groups. In line with these findings, the scale is considered a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating teachers' book reading practices in the Turkish culture.

    RDL Kalıcı Kaydıİncele
  • ArticleYayıncıda açık erişim2023
    The Complexity of the Grading System in Turkish Higher Education

    Gur, Recep; Koroglu, Mustafa

    Based on the academic performance grades of university students, various high-stakes decisions are made, including determinations of pass/fail status, the awarding of diplomas, and eligibility for placement in graduate education programs. According to the criteria used, the types of assessment are divided into two assessment, criterion-referenced assessments and norm referenced assessments. When the grading system of state universities in Turkish higher education is examined, it has been observed that some universities use criterion-referenced assessment, some use norm-referenced assessment, and some use both assessment systems. The purpose of this research is to examine whether inter-university grading systems show significant concordance in the context of university students' letter grades or not. In other words, it is to reveal whether there are skew in the grading systems of public universities. In this context, 250 individuals were simulated in a way that their class/group achievement level would show a normal distribution. Among the public universities in the 2021-2022 Academic Performance Ranking of Universities (URAP), four state universities were determined in the first quarter, second quarter, third quarter, and last quarter. The letter grades of each student's academic success grade in the relevant universities were determined and it was examined whether there was a significant concordance between the letter grades of the students. In the study, it was concluded that in the context of university students' letter grades, interuniversity grading systems generally do not show significant concordance. The findings are expected to contribute to the work of the Council of Higher Education and the University Education Commissions.

    RDL Kalıcı Kaydıİncele
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
creativeworkseries.issn2148-7456
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-20T15:48:39.868022679Z
dc.date.available2026-10-20T15:48:39.868022679Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/25866
dc.publisherIZZET KARA
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN EDUCATION
dspace.entity.typeJournal