Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
Yayınlar
- ArticleAçık Erişim2024The Principle of the Irrevocability of Phases
Yasar, Ercan
Regarding the phases/stages in criminal procedure, investigation and the main trial stages come to mind. Although it is not directly mentioned in the current Code of Criminal Procedure (with code no. 5271), there is an intermediate trial phase. This phase, which allows the return of the indictment with a limited period of time, is not important for our study because it is still considered as the investigation phase in terms of our current law. Because when the irrevocability of the stages is mentioned, what is meant exclusively is the irreversibility from the main trial phase to the investigation phase. Since the intermediate trial phase is also counted as the investigation phase, we can indirectly say that it is not possible to return to the intermediate trial phase from the main trial phase. Since the legislator does not qualify a separate phase, although there is no obstacle in terms of the principle of irrevocability from phases, it is not clear whether the prosecutor can withdraw the indictment independently of the court during the intermediate trial phase; to put it more accurately, it does not seem possible since it is not foreseen in the legislation. Indeed, with the start of the main trial phase, the phase in which the prosecutor effectively acts, comes to an end, and the task of executing and managing the process passes to the court. However, in some cases, the lack of judgement conditions or the emergence of obstacles to judgement may require returning to the investigation phase or making a decision to stop and correcting the relevant deficiencies by out-of-court authorities. For this reason, in some country practises, it is possible to return to the investigation phase during and/or after the main hearing period. Because we do not have a regulation that allows this issue, in our opinion, irreparable results emerge in the main trial phase. Likewise, the recent annulment decision of the Constitutional Court regarding the accelerated proceeding also necessitates a return to the investigation phase. We have discussed this study in order to propose changes in our legislation by trying to explain within the framework of comparative law that it should be possible to return to the investigation phase in order to eliminate the injustices (problems in the context of a fair trial) that may arise in these and similar cases.
RDL Kalıcı Kaydıİncele - ArticleYalnız künye2022İlim ve Edebiyat Eserlerinde Eser Sahiplerinin Mali Haklarına Tecavüzün Cezai Boyutu
Yasar, Ercan; Sönmez, Melih
Telif hukuku en genel anlamıyla iktisadi ve ekonomik değer taşıyan ve şekillendirilmiş fikri ürünleri koru- yan bir hukuk dalı olarak tanımlanabilir. Ülkelerin gelişmişlik düzeylerinde önemli bir rolü olan bu alanın tarihsel süreç boyunca gerek küresel çapta gerekse ülkemiz özelinde giderek önemini arttırdığı gözlem- lenmektedir. Fikri ürünler ülkelerin kültürel faaliyetlerinin gelişmesine pozitif katkılar sağladığı gibi ülkelerin ekonomik olarak gelişmesine de imkân vermektedir. Küresel çapta rekabet edebilir kalıp fikri ürünlerin kendi ülkesinde geliştirilmesini tesis etmek isteyen bir ülkenin, söz konusu alandaki kanuni düzenlemelerine gerekli hassasiyeti göstermesi zorunluluk teşkil etmektedir. Bu bakımdan kanaatimizce telif hukukunun başarısında “hukuki caydırıcılık ilkesi” anahtar bir rol oynamaktadır. Fikri haklar, kanun koyucu tarafından öncelikle tazmin, zoralım ve benzeri özel hukuk norm ve müesseseleriyle korunmaya çalışılmaktadır. Ayrıca cezai müeyyideler öngören kanun hükümleriyle birlikte, bu haklara tecavüz halin- de caydırıcılık sağlanmaya çalışılmaktadır. Fikri haklara yönelik tecavüz bir haksız fiil teşkil etmektedir. Özellikle teknolojinin gelişmesi bu alandaki hak ihlallerini (haksız fiillerin gerçekleştirilme ihtimallerini) gittikçe kolaylaştırmaktadır. Bu durum kişilerin fikri haklarına tecavüzleri sıklaştırdığı gibi toplumsal barışı da tehlikeye sokmaktadır.
RDL Kalıcı Kaydıİncele - ArticleAçık Erişim2022Adli Kontrol Tedbirleri Çerçevesinde Geçirilen Sürelerin Mahsubu ve Tazmini
Yasar, Ercan
Ceza muhakemesi hukuku uygulamasına Fransız hukukundan esinlenerek alındığı bilinen adli kontrol tedbirleri öncelikli olarak tutuklama koruma tedbirine seçenek olması düşüncesiyle getirilmiştir. Çeşitli şekillerde ortaya çıkan bu adli kontrol tedbirlerinin bazılarının kişi hürriyeti üzerinde ciddi kısıtlamalara sebebiyet verdiğini bilinmektedir. Temel hak ve hürriyetlere ciddi müdahale bu tedbirlerin tutuklama tedbirine seçenek oluşturmalarından da kaynaklanmaktadır. Kişi hürriyetinin kısıtlanması konutu terk etmeme yükümlülüğünde olduğu gibi bazı durumlarda fiili olarak tutukevinde bulunmaya neredeyse eşdeğer neticeler doğurmaktadır. Kimi adli kontrol tedbirlerinde ise bu temel hak ve hürriyetlere müdahale görece daha hafif bir hal teşkil etmektedir. Kanun koyucu son dönemlerde mahsup ve tazminata ilişkin artan tartışmaları gidermek için birtakım değişikliklere gitmiş ancak bu mahsup halini sınırlı tedbir türüne hasretmiş ve fakat tazminata ilişkin ise bir düzenlemeye yer vermemiştir. Çalışma ile mevcut kanun düzenlemeler çerçevesinde mahsup ve veya tazminata ilişkin diğer adli kontrol tedbirlerini kapsayıcı bir uygulamanın mümkün olup olmadığı öğreti ve uygulamada verilen kararlar çerçevesinde ele alınacaktır.
RDL Kalıcı Kaydıİncele - ArticleAçık Erişim2021Determination of the completion and termination of theft and robbery under turkish law in the light of robbery-like theft under german law
Yasar, Ercan
With this study, the crime of robbery-like theft, regulated in section 252 of theGerman Penal Code, will be discussed, and then, within the framework of the obtainedcriteria, the time of completion of the theft and robbery crimes in Turkish law will bedetermined. Hereinafter we will try to explain how the cases that are similar to theacts that are transformed from theft to robbery-like theft will be determined in currentTurkish law. Since the completion and termination of the crime have eff ects in thecontext of voluntary abandonment and active remorse, these issues will be clarifi edthrough similar cases.
RDL Kalıcı Kaydıİncele - Conference ObjectYalnız künye2021Voluntary abandonment by executive behaviour that has not achieved the degree of attempt
Yasar, Ercan; Iba, Hasan
Voluntary abandonment is a personal reason that removes punishment in terms of wrongfulness at the degree of criminal attempt. According to Turkish law voluntary abandonment is an institution linked to criminal attempt. Therefore, before making an assessment on the voluntary abandonment as an institution, it is necessary to determine whether there is an act which has reached the wrongfulness at the degree of criminal attempt. The Article 35 of the Turkish Penal Code No. 5237 sets out that criminal attempt has two main elements, one is positive and the other is negative, former is beginning to intend the crime with direct and appropriate acts and the latter is not completing the crime due to circumstances beyond defendant’s control. This study focuses on the practical drawbacks for narrowing the punishment caused by the interpretation of the article 35 of the Turkish Penal Code by adhering to the legality principle and proposes a solution to eliminate these drawbacks.
RDL Kalıcı Kaydıİncele - ArticleYalnız künye2021An assessment on the power-limiting function of criminal law
Yasar, Ercan
The purpose of this article is to find out specifically,\rwhether criminal law has a function of limitation when it comes to\rpublic authority (government), and if so, how and with what kind of\rmechanisms this function of criminal law could be used effectively\rin a state which is run by rule of law. Criminal law concentrates itself to regulate and sanction a specific act and/or omission of individuals. Unlike constitutional law, criminal law does not construct\rsome law mechanisms to ensure the separation of power and to\rregulate how legislative, executive and judicative organs operate. For this reason, criminal law does not have the function of limitation\rregarding public authorities, especially the government. This holds\rtrue even though there are some recent publications which analyse\rthe function of criminal law by limiting the power of government\rand/or state. Some authors concluded that criminal law does have\rsuch functions to limit the state power while others were contradictory with their undeniable arguments. This article aims to outline\rand analyse the current discussions about this topic.
RDL Kalıcı Kaydıİncele - ArticleYalnız künye2021Victim offender mediation in turkish criminal law
Yasar, Ercan
The aim of this work is to provide an insight into the legal practice of Turkey about \rvictim offender mediation (but can also be referred to as arbitration, conflict \rresolution without court proceedings, alternative dispute resolution). It is already \rknown to the readers. However, a short introduction about this institute and its \ranchoring in Turkey is initially given in order to internalize the implementation of this \rinstitute. In order to clarify the difference between Turkish and German legal practice, \ra number of legal comparisons were carried out.\rRatio of the VOM, qualification of the mediators, application requirements, legal \rconsequences of the institute on the procedure and on those involved are discussed in \rmore detail. Finally, the course of the VOM procedure and the problems that arise in \rlegal practice are examined in detail.
RDL Kalıcı Kaydıİncele