Measuring Perceived Social Support After Disaster: Development and Validation of the Perceived Social Support in Disasters Scale (PSSDS-28)

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Background/Objectives: Measuring perceived social support after disaster remains an unresolved psychometric problem. Most instruments do not jointly capture the source of support (from whom it comes) and its function (how it operates). None has been validated in a disaster-survivor sample with retrospectively framed items. We developed and validated the Perceived Social Support in Disasters Scale (PSSDS-28), a 28-item measure integrating both dimensions. Methods: In Phase 1, a PRISMA 2020-guided systematic review; a two-round Delphi with eight experts, cognitive interviews (n = 12); and a pilot study (N = 150) produced a 31-item form. In Phase 2, face-to-face data were collected from 607 adults affected by the 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes (Türkiye). Multiple analytic frameworks converged on a five-factor, 28-item structure comprising family–relative, social environment, institutional, emotional, and instrumental–informational support. Results: The correlated five-factor model fit the independent validation sample well (CFI = 0.954, RMSEA = 0.076, and SRMR = 0.072) and outperformed a one-factor alternative (ΔCFI = 0.222). Blocks showed strong internal consistency (ordinal α = 0.852–0.949), composite reliability (0.865–0.950), and adequate test–retest stability (ICC = 0.542–0.909). Scalar measurement invariance held across six groupings, with no meaningful differential item functioning. Convergent and discriminant evidence supported construct validity, and common-method variance was negligible. Institutional (M = 3.29) and instrumental–informational support (M = 2.99) scored lowest—a profile a global score would conceal. Conclusions: The PSSDS-28 provides promising initial psychometric evidence for a multidimensional post-disaster assessment instrument situated at the perceived–received interface, a target that general-purpose scales are not designed to capture. Criterion-related validity, cross-cultural validity, and cross-disaster replicability remain to be demonstrated. © 2026 by the authors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10202Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14162573Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorOruç, Abdurrahman
dc.contributor.authorCengiz, Ekrem
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:25:27.758392567Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:25:27.758392567Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBackground/Objectives: Measuring perceived social support after disaster remains an unresolved psychometric problem. Most instruments do not jointly capture the source of support (from whom it comes) and its function (how it operates). None has been validated in a disaster-survivor sample with retrospectively framed items. We developed and validated the Perceived Social Support in Disasters Scale (PSSDS-28), a 28-item measure integrating both dimensions. Methods: In Phase 1, a PRISMA 2020-guided systematic review; a two-round Delphi with eight experts, cognitive interviews (n = 12); and a pilot study (N = 150) produced a 31-item form. In Phase 2, face-to-face data were collected from 607 adults affected by the 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes (Türkiye). Multiple analytic frameworks converged on a five-factor, 28-item structure comprising family–relative, social environment, institutional, emotional, and instrumental–informational support. Results: The correlated five-factor model fit the independent validation sample well (CFI = 0.954, RMSEA = 0.076, and SRMR = 0.072) and outperformed a one-factor alternative (ΔCFI = 0.222). Blocks showed strong internal consistency (ordinal α = 0.852–0.949), composite reliability (0.865–0.950), and adequate test–retest stability (ICC = 0.542–0.909). Scalar measurement invariance held across six groupings, with no meaningful differential item functioning. Convergent and discriminant evidence supported construct validity, and common-method variance was negligible. Institutional (M = 3.29) and instrumental–informational support (M = 2.99) scored lowest—a profile a global score would conceal. Conclusions: The PSSDS-28 provides promising initial psychometric evidence for a multidimensional post-disaster assessment instrument situated at the perceived–received interface, a target that general-purpose scales are not designed to capture. Criterion-related validity, cross-cultural validity, and cross-disaster replicability remain to be demonstrated. © 2026 by the authors.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/healthcare14162573
dc.identifier.eissn2227-9032
dc.identifier.issn2227-9032
dc.identifier.issue16
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC13512528
dc.identifier.pmid42651342
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105048455954
dc.identifier.startpage2573
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10202
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001859031100001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
dc.relation.ispartofHealthcare (Switzerland)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectdisaster
dc.subjectmeasurement invariance
dc.subjectperceived social support
dc.subjectscale development
dc.subjectstructural validity
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectcognition
dc.subjectconstruct validity
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectcriterion related validity
dc.subjectcross-cultural validity
dc.subjectearthquake
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinternal consistency
dc.subjectinterview
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectpilot study
dc.subjectPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
dc.subjectreliability
dc.subjectsocial environment
dc.subjectsocial support
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.subjectvalidity
dc.titleMeasuring Perceived Social Support After Disaster: Development and Validation of the Perceived Social Support in Disasters Scale (PSSDS-28)
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.departmentDepartment of Property Protection and Security, Civil Defense and Firefighting, Uzumlu Vocational School, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan 24150, Türkiye.
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
rdl.wos.indexSocial Science Citation Index (SSCI)