Chronic Pain and Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive, Phenotype-Based Review of Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Management

Review ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Background/Objectives: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) relieves pain and restores function for most patients with end-stage knee disease; yet, a clinically important minority are left with persistent pain, stiffness or both despite well-fixed, well-aligned implants. These “hidden failures” are poorly captured by implant survivorship but drive disability, dissatisfaction and disproportionate cost—stiff knees incur roughly 1.5–7.5 times the two-year treatment costs of non-stiff knees. This review integrates three usually separate studies within one phenotype-based framework. Methods: A structured comprehensive narrative review and thematic synthesis was undertaken; PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched between 30 October 2025 and 1 May 2026, identifying 467 records, of which 239 met the eligibility criteria and informed the synthesis. Results: Clinically meaningful chronic pain affects roughly 10–30% of recipients and stiffness approximately 1–7%, with high-impact chronic pain persisting in about one-in-five and neuropathic features in a third to a half of those affected. Contemporary dissatisfaction estimates appear closer to 7–14% than the historical “one-in-five” paradigm, with persistent pain and stiffness the dominant drivers of residual dissatisfaction. Symptoms arise from interacting mechanical, fibrotic, infective, neuropathic, central and psychosocial mechanisms. Six practical phenotypes are proposed—pain-dominant with preserved motion, stiffness-dominant, combined stiff-and-painful, neuropathic-dominant, centrally sensitized, and arthrofibrosis with true mechanical block—and diagnosis, prevention and management are organized around them, spanning risk stratification, surgical technique, manipulation under anesthesia (mean gains ~30–47°, ~6% failure), arthrolysis, revision and multidisciplinary pain care. Conclusions: Chronic pain and stiffness are the quiet arithmetic of arthroplasty success—rare on the survivorship curve, common in the clinic. Matching treatment to phenotype and reserving the operating theater for a knee with a mechanical fault to fix rather than a nervous system to calm, offers the clearest path from a technically successful operation to a genuinely successful recovery. © 2026 by the author.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10281Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15145557Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorYapıcı, Furkan
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:25:31.316927383Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:25:31.316927383Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBackground/Objectives: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) relieves pain and restores function for most patients with end-stage knee disease; yet, a clinically important minority are left with persistent pain, stiffness or both despite well-fixed, well-aligned implants. These “hidden failures” are poorly captured by implant survivorship but drive disability, dissatisfaction and disproportionate cost—stiff knees incur roughly 1.5–7.5 times the two-year treatment costs of non-stiff knees. This review integrates three usually separate studies within one phenotype-based framework. Methods: A structured comprehensive narrative review and thematic synthesis was undertaken; PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched between 30 October 2025 and 1 May 2026, identifying 467 records, of which 239 met the eligibility criteria and informed the synthesis. Results: Clinically meaningful chronic pain affects roughly 10–30% of recipients and stiffness approximately 1–7%, with high-impact chronic pain persisting in about one-in-five and neuropathic features in a third to a half of those affected. Contemporary dissatisfaction estimates appear closer to 7–14% than the historical “one-in-five” paradigm, with persistent pain and stiffness the dominant drivers of residual dissatisfaction. Symptoms arise from interacting mechanical, fibrotic, infective, neuropathic, central and psychosocial mechanisms. Six practical phenotypes are proposed—pain-dominant with preserved motion, stiffness-dominant, combined stiff-and-painful, neuropathic-dominant, centrally sensitized, and arthrofibrosis with true mechanical block—and diagnosis, prevention and management are organized around them, spanning risk stratification, surgical technique, manipulation under anesthesia (mean gains ~30–47°, ~6% failure), arthrolysis, revision and multidisciplinary pain care. Conclusions: Chronic pain and stiffness are the quiet arithmetic of arthroplasty success—rare on the survivorship curve, common in the clinic. Matching treatment to phenotype and reserving the operating theater for a knee with a mechanical fault to fix rather than a nervous system to calm, offers the clearest path from a technically successful operation to a genuinely successful recovery. © 2026 by the author.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research received no external funding.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm15145557
dc.identifier.eissn2077-0383
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383
dc.identifier.issue14
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC13413427
dc.identifier.pmid42513471
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105045801008
dc.identifier.startpage5557
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10281
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001832210900001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Medicine
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectarthrofibrosis
dc.subjectcentral sensitization
dc.subjectchronic postsurgical pain
dc.subjectmanipulation under anesthesia
dc.subjectmultidisciplinary pain management
dc.subjectneuropathic pain
dc.subjectrange of motion
dc.subjectrevision knee arthroplasty
dc.subjectstiffness
dc.subjecttotal knee arthroplasty
dc.subjectanalgesia
dc.subjectanesthesia
dc.subjectarithmetic
dc.subjectarthrolysis
dc.subjectchronic pain
dc.subjectchronic postoperative pain
dc.subjectdiagnosis
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectknee arthroplasty
dc.subjectknee disease
dc.subjectknee stiffness
dc.subjectoperating room
dc.subjectpain
dc.subjectphenotype
dc.subjectpolyneuropathy
dc.subjectprevention
dc.subjectreview
dc.subjectrigidity
dc.subjectsurgical technique
dc.subjectsurvivorship
dc.titleChronic Pain and Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive, Phenotype-Based Review of Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Management
dc.typeReview Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus1
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.departmentDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan 24100, Turkey.
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)