Tibiofemoral subluxation in the coronal plane does not affect WOMAC and KOOS after total knee arthroplasty

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Purpose: To investigate the effect of preoperative coronal tibiofemoral subluxation (CTFS) on functional outcome, prosthesis type, insert thickness and revision rates in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: A total of 224 knees of 186 patients were included. Patients were divided into two groups as either with (Group 1, 114 knees of 86 patients) or without (Group 2, 124 knees of 100 patients) coronal lateral tibiofemoral subluxation. The mean follow-up period was 71.3 ± 7.3 (range 60–84) months in group 1 and 69.4 ± 6.6 (range 61–79) months in group 2 (n.s.). Coronal tibiofemoral subluxation degree was measured in degrees on standing anteroposterior knee radiographs. Group 1 was divided into three subgroups according to amount of subluxation (< 5 mm, 6–10 mm and > 10 mm). Functional outcome was evaluated using the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) preoperatively and at the last follow-up visit. Prosthesis type, insert thickness and revision rates were compared between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding patient demographics, prosthesis type, and revision rates (n.s.). The insert thickness was found significantly higher in group 1 (p < 0.001). The preoperative and postoperative WOMAC and KOOS scores were found no significantly different between the two groups (n.s.). Among subluxation (+) subgroups, there was no significant difference in functional outcome scores and revision rates (n.s.). However, prosthesis type and insert thickness were significantly associated with the amount of subluxation (p = 0.009 and p = 0.001, respectively). There was no significant correlation between the degree of lower extremity deformity and coronal tibiofemoral amount of subluxation (n.s.). Conclusion: Preoperative CTFS does not adversely affect the WOMAC score, KOOS and revision rates after TKA. In the clinical practice, surgeons should be aware of the need for a posterior cruciate stabilizing prosthesis and a thicker insert in the presence of CTFS, especially with subluxation greater than 10 mm and to consider a spared bony resection on the tibia in patients suffering from CTFS. Level of evidence: IV. © 2020, European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13252Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06047-9Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorBuyukkuscu, Mehmet Ozbey
dc.contributor.authorMisir, Abdulhamit
dc.contributor.authorKirat, Akay
dc.contributor.authorAlbayrak, Kutalmis
dc.contributor.authorSencan, Kerem
dc.contributor.authorCamurcu, Ismet Yalkin
dc.contributor.authorGursu, Sukru Sarper
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:28:05.630073003Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:28:05.630073003Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To investigate the effect of preoperative coronal tibiofemoral subluxation (CTFS) on functional outcome, prosthesis type, insert thickness and revision rates in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: A total of 224 knees of 186 patients were included. Patients were divided into two groups as either with (Group 1, 114 knees of 86 patients) or without (Group 2, 124 knees of 100 patients) coronal lateral tibiofemoral subluxation. The mean follow-up period was 71.3 ± 7.3 (range 60–84) months in group 1 and 69.4 ± 6.6 (range 61–79) months in group 2 (n.s.). Coronal tibiofemoral subluxation degree was measured in degrees on standing anteroposterior knee radiographs. Group 1 was divided into three subgroups according to amount of subluxation (< 5 mm, 6–10 mm and > 10 mm). Functional outcome was evaluated using the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) preoperatively and at the last follow-up visit. Prosthesis type, insert thickness and revision rates were compared between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding patient demographics, prosthesis type, and revision rates (n.s.). The insert thickness was found significantly higher in group 1 (p < 0.001). The preoperative and postoperative WOMAC and KOOS scores were found no significantly different between the two groups (n.s.). Among subluxation (+) subgroups, there was no significant difference in functional outcome scores and revision rates (n.s.). However, prosthesis type and insert thickness were significantly associated with the amount of subluxation (p = 0.009 and p = 0.001, respectively). There was no significant correlation between the degree of lower extremity deformity and coronal tibiofemoral amount of subluxation (n.s.). Conclusion: Preoperative CTFS does not adversely affect the WOMAC score, KOOS and revision rates after TKA. In the clinical practice, surgeons should be aware of the need for a posterior cruciate stabilizing prosthesis and a thicker insert in the presence of CTFS, especially with subluxation greater than 10 mm and to consider a spared bony resection on the tibia in patients suffering from CTFS. Level of evidence: IV. © 2020, European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00167-020-06047-9
dc.identifier.eissn1433-7347
dc.identifier.endpage920
dc.identifier.issn0942-2056
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pmid32367202
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85085085846
dc.identifier.startpage914
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13252
dc.identifier.volume29
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000530230300001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
dc.relation.ispartofKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectCoronal
dc.subjectInsert
dc.subjectOsteoarthritis
dc.subjectOutcome
dc.subjectPosterior stabilized
dc.subjectRevision
dc.subjectTibiofemoral subluxation
dc.subjectTotal knee arthroplasty
dc.subjectArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFemur
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectJoint Dislocations
dc.subjectKnee
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectOsteoarthritis, Knee
dc.subjectPostoperative Period
dc.subjectRadiography
dc.subjectRange of Motion, Articular
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectTibia
dc.subjectdiagnostic imaging
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectjoint characteristics and functions
dc.subjectjoint dislocation
dc.subjectknee osteoarthritis
dc.subjectknee replacement
dc.subjectpathology
dc.subjectpathophysiology
dc.titleTibiofemoral subluxation in the coronal plane does not affect WOMAC and KOOS after total knee arthroplasty
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus6
rdl.citation.wos5
rdl.departmentDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan University, Erzincan, 24030, Turkey.
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)