Are the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist-to-hip ratio better than BMI to predict recurrent pregnancy loss?

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Purpose: Etiology could not be determined in approximately 50% of recurrent pregnancy loss cases, and it was named unexpected recurrent pregnancy loss(URPL). A body shape index(ABSI), body roundness index(BRI), and waist-to-hip ratio(WtHR) are new indexes that are superior to BMI in showing body fat distribution. We aimed to investigate the potency of ABSI, BRI, and WtHR in URPL, their superiority to BMI, and their suitability for clinical use. Methods: One hundred and thirty-eight patients between the ages of 20-40 who applied to our hospital for URPL between January 2016 and December 31, 2020 were included in our study. Weight, height, waist circumference, and hip circumference were measured, and indexes were calculated. Differences between the URPL and control groups were calculated using the IBM SPSS program. Results: There was a significant difference between the two groups for BRI, ABSI, and WtHR values, while there was no significant difference in BMI. BRI(4.4 ± 1.7vs3.9 ± 1.5), ABSI(0.08 ± 0.005 vs 0.078 ± 0.004), and WtHR(0.84 ± 0.06vs0.82 ± 0.05) values were higher in the URPL group. ROC analysis showed us that BRI, ABSI, and WtHR have a diagnostic value for URPL(P <.05). When indexes were above the cutoff values, RPL risk increased 3.59 times in ABSI, 2.26 times in BRI, and 2.9 times in WtHR(P <.05). Conclusions: The relationship between obesity and URPL can be explained more clearly by using effective indexes that show body fat distribution rather than BMI. Ethics committee approval was obtained from Erzincan Binali Yildirim University in 14.01.2021. Clinical Research Ethics Committee no: 01/01. © 2021 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13297Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12388Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKiremitli, Tunay
dc.contributor.authorKiremitli, Sevil
dc.contributor.authorUlug, Pasa
dc.contributor.authorDinc, Kemal
dc.contributor.authorUzel, Kemine
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Yusuf Kemal
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:28:08.145671897Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:28:08.145671897Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Etiology could not be determined in approximately 50% of recurrent pregnancy loss cases, and it was named unexpected recurrent pregnancy loss(URPL). A body shape index(ABSI), body roundness index(BRI), and waist-to-hip ratio(WtHR) are new indexes that are superior to BMI in showing body fat distribution. We aimed to investigate the potency of ABSI, BRI, and WtHR in URPL, their superiority to BMI, and their suitability for clinical use. Methods: One hundred and thirty-eight patients between the ages of 20-40 who applied to our hospital for URPL between January 2016 and December 31, 2020 were included in our study. Weight, height, waist circumference, and hip circumference were measured, and indexes were calculated. Differences between the URPL and control groups were calculated using the IBM SPSS program. Results: There was a significant difference between the two groups for BRI, ABSI, and WtHR values, while there was no significant difference in BMI. BRI(4.4 ± 1.7vs3.9 ± 1.5), ABSI(0.08 ± 0.005 vs 0.078 ± 0.004), and WtHR(0.84 ± 0.06vs0.82 ± 0.05) values were higher in the URPL group. ROC analysis showed us that BRI, ABSI, and WtHR have a diagnostic value for URPL(P <.05). When indexes were above the cutoff values, RPL risk increased 3.59 times in ABSI, 2.26 times in BRI, and 2.9 times in WtHR(P <.05). Conclusions: The relationship between obesity and URPL can be explained more clearly by using effective indexes that show body fat distribution rather than BMI. Ethics committee approval was obtained from Erzincan Binali Yildirim University in 14.01.2021. Clinical Research Ethics Committee no: 01/01. © 2021 The Authors. Reproductive Medicine and Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/rmb2.12388
dc.identifier.eissn1447-0578
dc.identifier.endpage333
dc.identifier.issn1445-5781
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC8254164
dc.identifier.pmid34262401
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85106263438
dc.identifier.startpage327
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13297
dc.identifier.volume20
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000652628900001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofReproductive Medicine and Biology
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjecta body shape index
dc.subjectbody mass index
dc.subjectbody roundness index
dc.subjectrecurrent pregnancy loss
dc.subjectwaist-to-hip ratio
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectanthropometric parameters
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectbody fat distribution
dc.subjectbody height
dc.subjectbody mass
dc.subjectbody shape index
dc.subjectbody weight
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdiagnostic value
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthip circumference
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectintermethod comparison
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectobesity
dc.subjectovarian reserve
dc.subjectrecurrent abortion
dc.subjectunexpected recurrent pregnancy loss
dc.subjectwaist circumference
dc.subjectwaist hip ratio
dc.titleAre the body shape index, the body roundness index and waist-to-hip ratio better than BMI to predict recurrent pregnancy loss?
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus9
rdl.citation.wos8
rdl.departmentMedical Faculty, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department Erzincan Binali Yildirim University Erzincan Turkey. | Biostatistics Department Medical Faculty Erzincan Binali Yildirim University Erzincan Turkey.
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)