Comparison of prediction accuracy of five different biometric formulas; [Comparação da acurácia preditiva de cinco fórmulas biométricas diferentes]

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Objective: To compare the performance of Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraft/Theoretical, Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, Kane, and Hill-radial basis function formulas to calculate intraocular lens power in eyes with normal axial length, in terms of predicting target refraction by using partial coherence interferometry technology. Methods: Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation were performed in 135 eyes of 135 patients with an axial length between 22 and 24.5 mm. Axial length, keratometry, and anterior chamber depth were measured by intraocular lens Master 500. Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraft/Theoretical, Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, Kane, and Hill-radial basis function formulas were used for intraocular lens power calculations. The difference between the expected postoperative refraction and the mean absolute prediction error was calculated for each eye. Statistical significance was evaluated at the level of p<0.05. Results: The study included 135 subjects. The mean axial length, anterior chamber depth, keratometry, and intraocular lens power were 23.2±1.2 (22 to 24.5) mm, 3.2±0.4 (2.4 to 4.4) mm, 43.5±1.5 (40.8 to 46.2) diopter, 21.5±1.8 (18.5 to 25.5) diopter, respectively. The mean absolute prediction error for Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraft/Theoretical, Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, Kane, and Hill-radial basis function was 0.306±0.291, 0.312±0.257, 0.314±0.268, 0.299±0.206 and 0.308±0.280, respectively (p>0.05). Conclusion: The study showed the third-generation (Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraft/Theoretical and Hoffer Q), fourth-generation (Barrett Universal II) and new-generation (Kane and Hill-radial basis function) intraocular lens power calculation formulas had similar performances regarding calculation of intraocular lens power to predict target refraction after phacoemulsification in eyes with normal axial length. © 2021. Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia. All rights reserved.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13360Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37039/1982.8551.20210034Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorUğurlu, Adem
dc.contributor.authorAltınkurt, Emre
dc.contributor.authorErgül, Elif
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:28:12.116720971Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:28:12.116720971Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the performance of Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraft/Theoretical, Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, Kane, and Hill-radial basis function formulas to calculate intraocular lens power in eyes with normal axial length, in terms of predicting target refraction by using partial coherence interferometry technology. Methods: Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation were performed in 135 eyes of 135 patients with an axial length between 22 and 24.5 mm. Axial length, keratometry, and anterior chamber depth were measured by intraocular lens Master 500. Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraft/Theoretical, Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, Kane, and Hill-radial basis function formulas were used for intraocular lens power calculations. The difference between the expected postoperative refraction and the mean absolute prediction error was calculated for each eye. Statistical significance was evaluated at the level of p<0.05. Results: The study included 135 subjects. The mean axial length, anterior chamber depth, keratometry, and intraocular lens power were 23.2±1.2 (22 to 24.5) mm, 3.2±0.4 (2.4 to 4.4) mm, 43.5±1.5 (40.8 to 46.2) diopter, 21.5±1.8 (18.5 to 25.5) diopter, respectively. The mean absolute prediction error for Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraft/Theoretical, Hoffer Q, Barrett Universal II, Kane, and Hill-radial basis function was 0.306±0.291, 0.312±0.257, 0.314±0.268, 0.299±0.206 and 0.308±0.280, respectively (p>0.05). Conclusion: The study showed the third-generation (Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraft/Theoretical and Hoffer Q), fourth-generation (Barrett Universal II) and new-generation (Kane and Hill-radial basis function) intraocular lens power calculation formulas had similar performances regarding calculation of intraocular lens power to predict target refraction after phacoemulsification in eyes with normal axial length. © 2021. Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.37039/1982.8551.20210034
dc.identifier.endpage5
dc.identifier.issn0034-7280
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85116522333
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13360
dc.identifier.volume80
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Oftalmologia
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectBiometry
dc.subjectCataract
dc.subjectintraocular
dc.subjectLenses
dc.subjectocular
dc.subjectRefraction
dc.subjectaccuracy
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectanterior eye chamber depth
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectBarrett Universal II formula
dc.subjectbest corrected visual acuity
dc.subjectcross-sectional study
dc.subjecteye axis length
dc.subjecteye refraction
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectHilld radial basis function
dc.subjectHoffer Q formula
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinterferometry
dc.subjectintermethod comparison
dc.subjectKane formula
dc.subjectkeratometry
dc.subjectlens implantation
dc.subjectlens power
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmiddle aged
dc.subjectobservational study
dc.subjectphacoemulsification
dc.titleComparison of prediction accuracy of five different biometric formulas; [Comparação da acurácia preditiva de cinco fórmulas biométricas diferentes]
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus1
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS