Effect of Surgical Approaches on Deltoid Innervation and Clinical Outcomes in the Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the effects of deltopectoral and anterolateral acromial approaches commonly used in open reduction-internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures on the clinical outcomes, and axillary nerve damage through electrophysiological assessment. Patients and methods: Forty-eight patients (22 males, 26 females; mean age 47.9±13.2 years; range, 22 to 73 years) diagnosed with Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO)/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) type 11 proximal humeral fractures who underwent osteosynthesis with anatomical locking plates in our hospital between January 2015 and June 2016 were prospectively examined. The patients were divided into two groups according to either the deltopectoral or anterolateral deltoid-split surgical approach used. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores and Constant-Murley scores (CMS) obtained at three- and 12-month follow-up visits. Needle electromyography (EMG) was performed for the electrophysiological assessment of the deltoid muscle. Results: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of demographic data, follow-up times, and complications. DASH scores and CMS obtained postoperatively at three months (p=0.327 and p=0.531, respectively) and 12 months (p=0.324 and p=0.648, respectively) revealed no significant differences. In addition, the two groups did not significantly differ with respect to the presence of EMG abnormalities (p=0.792). Avascular necrosis of the humeral head was detected in only two patients from the deltopectoral group. Conclusion: Deltopectoral and anterolateral approaches do not differ regarding the presence of postoperative EMG abnormalities and functional outcomes. Surgeons can thus adopt either approach. However, dissection without damaging the soft tissue should be performed in both approaches. © 2020. by the Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation. All rights reserved.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13668Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.74218Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorÖzbey Büyükkuşcu, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorKulduk, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorMısır, Abdülhamit
dc.contributor.authorÇetinkaya, Engin
dc.contributor.authorÇamurcu, smet Yalkın
dc.contributor.authorŞükrü, Sarper Gürsu
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:28:30.037882726Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:28:30.037882726Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aims to investigate the effects of deltopectoral and anterolateral acromial approaches commonly used in open reduction-internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures on the clinical outcomes, and axillary nerve damage through electrophysiological assessment. Patients and methods: Forty-eight patients (22 males, 26 females; mean age 47.9±13.2 years; range, 22 to 73 years) diagnosed with Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO)/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) type 11 proximal humeral fractures who underwent osteosynthesis with anatomical locking plates in our hospital between January 2015 and June 2016 were prospectively examined. The patients were divided into two groups according to either the deltopectoral or anterolateral deltoid-split surgical approach used. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores and Constant-Murley scores (CMS) obtained at three- and 12-month follow-up visits. Needle electromyography (EMG) was performed for the electrophysiological assessment of the deltoid muscle. Results: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of demographic data, follow-up times, and complications. DASH scores and CMS obtained postoperatively at three months (p=0.327 and p=0.531, respectively) and 12 months (p=0.324 and p=0.648, respectively) revealed no significant differences. In addition, the two groups did not significantly differ with respect to the presence of EMG abnormalities (p=0.792). Avascular necrosis of the humeral head was detected in only two patients from the deltopectoral group. Conclusion: Deltopectoral and anterolateral approaches do not differ regarding the presence of postoperative EMG abnormalities and functional outcomes. Surgeons can thus adopt either approach. However, dissection without damaging the soft tissue should be performed in both approaches. © 2020. by the Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.5606/ehc.2020.74218
dc.identifier.eissn2687-4792
dc.identifier.endpage522
dc.identifier.issn2687-4792
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pmid32962584
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85091566385
dc.identifier.startpage516
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13668
dc.identifier.volume31
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000573941100017
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTurkish Joint Diseases Foundation
dc.relation.ispartofJoint Diseases and Related Surgery
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectApproach
dc.subjectdeltoid
dc.subjectelectrophysiology
dc.subjectfracture
dc.subjectproximal humerus.
dc.subjectDeltoid Muscle
dc.subjectDisability Evaluation
dc.subjectElectromyography
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFracture Fixation, Internal
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectOpen Fracture Reduction
dc.subjectPeripheral Nerve Injuries
dc.subjectPostoperative Complications
dc.subjectShoulder
dc.subjectShoulder Fractures
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectadverse event
dc.subjectdevices
dc.subjectdisability
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinnervation
dc.subjectosteosynthesis
dc.subjectpathophysiology
dc.subjectperipheral nerve injury
dc.subjectpostoperative complication
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectshoulder fracture
dc.titleEffect of Surgical Approaches on Deltoid Innervation and Clinical Outcomes in the Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus4
rdl.citation.trdizin0
rdl.citation.wos4
rdl.departmentT.C. SAĞLIK BAKANLIĞI
rdl.departmentERZİNCAN BİNALİ YILDIRIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.departmentSAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.departmentÖzel Kuruluş
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)