Single level discectomy with and without disc prosthesis: A comparative study of 114 patients

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Background: Low back and leg pain due to lumbar discal hernia (LDH) is an important health issue. Current evidences support surgery in carefully selected patients who have failed conservative treatment and do not exhibit any psychosocial overlay. However, as known, sometimes it may be still very difficult to normalize the life qualities of patients for long times. Now different surgical methods for LDH are in use with new technological materials. One of them is lumbar disc prosthesis. In this study, the radiological and clinical effects of using lumbar disc prosthesis were evaluated with comparing patients underwent simple lumbar microdsicectomy. The purpose of this study is to reveal whether inserting the disc prosthesis into the intervertebral distance after lumbar microdiscectomy is beneficial or not both radiologically and clinically. Methods: A total of 114 patients were analyzed; the first cohort consisted of 57 patients who received a lumbar discectomy at a single level along with the implantation of a disc prosthesis and the second consisted of 57 patients only received a lumbar discectomy at a single level. These 2 groups were studied by comparing the disc space on the level of carried out operations with pain scales, foramen diameters of coming about related roots preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 years. Results: One of the significant results of the implementation of the disc prosthesis is fulfilment of a healthy disc height again after microdiscectomy due to LDH. We concluded that fulfilment of a healthy disc height with lumbar disc prosthesis was clinically beneficial for patients underwent microdiscectomy. Conclusions: Based on the results obtained in this study, it can be concluded that the implantation of a disc prosthesis in appropriate patients is more favorable regarding pain and spinal physiology when compared to simple microdiscectomy. © 2018 the Author(s).

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/14453Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000013854Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorÇakir, Tayfun
dc.contributor.authorÇakir, Mürteza
dc.contributor.authorÖnder, Hilmiokay
dc.contributor.authorYolaş, Coşkun
dc.contributor.authorTanriverdi, Osman
dc.contributor.authorÖmeroǧlu, Muhammed
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Yusuf Kemal
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:29:15.892595041Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:29:15.892595041Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractBackground: Low back and leg pain due to lumbar discal hernia (LDH) is an important health issue. Current evidences support surgery in carefully selected patients who have failed conservative treatment and do not exhibit any psychosocial overlay. However, as known, sometimes it may be still very difficult to normalize the life qualities of patients for long times. Now different surgical methods for LDH are in use with new technological materials. One of them is lumbar disc prosthesis. In this study, the radiological and clinical effects of using lumbar disc prosthesis were evaluated with comparing patients underwent simple lumbar microdsicectomy. The purpose of this study is to reveal whether inserting the disc prosthesis into the intervertebral distance after lumbar microdiscectomy is beneficial or not both radiologically and clinically. Methods: A total of 114 patients were analyzed; the first cohort consisted of 57 patients who received a lumbar discectomy at a single level along with the implantation of a disc prosthesis and the second consisted of 57 patients only received a lumbar discectomy at a single level. These 2 groups were studied by comparing the disc space on the level of carried out operations with pain scales, foramen diameters of coming about related roots preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 years. Results: One of the significant results of the implementation of the disc prosthesis is fulfilment of a healthy disc height again after microdiscectomy due to LDH. We concluded that fulfilment of a healthy disc height with lumbar disc prosthesis was clinically beneficial for patients underwent microdiscectomy. Conclusions: Based on the results obtained in this study, it can be concluded that the implantation of a disc prosthesis in appropriate patients is more favorable regarding pain and spinal physiology when compared to simple microdiscectomy. © 2018 the Author(s).
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/md.0000000000013854
dc.identifier.eissn1536-5964
dc.identifier.issn0025-7974
dc.identifier.issue52
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC6314736
dc.identifier.pmid30593186
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85059231232
dc.identifier.startpagee13854
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/14453
dc.identifier.volume97
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000456338700061
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofMedicine (United States)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectDisc height
dc.subjectLumbar disc prosthesis
dc.subjectLumbar discectomy
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectDiskectomy
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIntervertebral Disc Displacement
dc.subjectLow Back Pain
dc.subjectLumbar Vertebrae
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMicrosurgery
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectProsthesis Implantation
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectbackache
dc.subjectcohort analysis
dc.subjectdiscectomy
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectleg pain
dc.subjectlumbar disk hernia
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectpain assessment
dc.subjectpostoperative period
dc.subjectpreoperative period
dc.subjectpriority journal
dc.subjectradicular pain
dc.subjectrecurrent disease
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectcomplication
dc.titleSingle level discectomy with and without disc prosthesis: A comparative study of 114 patients
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus4
rdl.citation.wos3
rdl.departmentDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erzincan University Medical Faculty. | Department of Biostatistics, Erzincan University Medical Faculty, Erzincan, Turkey.
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)