The Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery: Defining a model for antimicrobial stewardship-results from an international cross-sectional survey

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Background: Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) have been promoted to optimize antimicrobial usage and patient outcomes, and to reduce the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant organisms. However, the best strategies for an ASP are not definitively established and are likely to vary based on local culture, policy, and routine clinical practice, and probably limited resources in middle-income countries. The aim of this study is to evaluate structures and resources of antimicrobial stewardship teams (ASTs) in surgical departments from different regions of the world. Methods: A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted in 2016 on 173 physicians who participated in the AGORA (Antimicrobials: A Global Alliance for Optimizing their Rational Use in Intra-Abdominal Infections) project and on 658 international experts in the fields of ASPs, infection control, and infections in surgery. Results: The response rate was 19.4%. One hundred fifty-six (98.7%) participants stated their hospital had a multidisciplinary AST. The median number of physicians working inside the team was five [interquartile range 4-6]. An infectious disease specialist, a microbiologist and an infection control specialist were, respectively, present in 80.1, 76.3, and 67.9% of the ASTs. A surgeon was a component in 59.0% of cases and was significantly more likely to be present in university hospitals (89.5%, p < 0.05) compared to community teaching (83.3%) and community hospitals (66.7%). Protocols for pre-operative prophylaxis and for antimicrobial treatment of surgical infections were respectively implemented in 96.2 and 82.3% of the hospitals. The majority of the surgical departments implemented both persuasive and restrictive interventions (72.8%). The most common types of interventions in surgical departments were dissemination of educational materials (62.5%), expert approval (61.0%), audit and feedback (55.1%), educational outreach (53.7%), and compulsory order forms (51.5%). Conclusion: The survey showed a heterogeneous organization of ASPs worldwide, demonstrating the necessity of a multidisciplinary and collaborative approach in the battle against antimicrobial resistance in surgical infections, and the importance of educational efforts towards this goal. © 2017 The Author(s).

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/14805Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-017-0145-2Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorSartelli, Massimo
dc.contributor.authorLabricciosa, Francesco M.
dc.contributor.authorBarbadoro, Pamela
dc.contributor.authorPagani, Leonardo
dc.contributor.authorAnsaloni, Luca
dc.contributor.authorBrink, Adrian J.
dc.contributor.authorCarlet, Jean
dc.contributor.authorKhanna, Ashish
dc.contributor.authorChichom-Mefire, Alain
dc.contributor.authorCoccolini, Federico
dc.contributor.authorDi Saverio, Salomone
dc.contributor.authorMay, Addison K.
dc.contributor.authorViale, Pierluigi
dc.contributor.authorWatkins, Richard R.
dc.contributor.authorScudeller, Luigia
dc.contributor.authorAbbo, Lilian M.
dc.contributor.authorAbu-Zidan, Fikri M.
dc.contributor.authorAdesunkanmi, Abdulrashid K.
dc.contributor.authorAl-Dahir, Sara
dc.contributor.authorAl-Hasan, Majdi N.
dc.contributor.authorAlis, Halil
dc.contributor.authorAlves, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorAraujo da Silva, André R.
dc.contributor.authorAugustin, Goran
dc.contributor.authorBala, Miklosh
dc.contributor.authorBarie, Philip S.
dc.contributor.authorBeltrán, Marcelo A.
dc.contributor.authorBhangu, Aneel
dc.contributor.authorBouchra, Belefquih
dc.contributor.authorBrecher, Stephen M.
dc.contributor.authorCaínzos, Miguel A.
dc.contributor.authorCamacho-Ortiz, Adrian
dc.contributor.authorCatani, Marco
dc.contributor.authorChandy, Sujith J.
dc.contributor.authorJusoh, Asri Che
dc.contributor.authorCherry-Bukowiec, Jill R.
dc.contributor.authorChiara, Osvaldo
dc.contributor.authorColak, Elif
dc.contributor.authorCornely, Oliver A.
dc.contributor.authorCui, Yunfeng
dc.contributor.authorDemetrashvili, Zaza
dc.contributor.authorDe Simone, Belinda
dc.contributor.authorDe Waele, Jan J.
dc.contributor.authorDhingra, Sameer
dc.contributor.authorDi Marzo, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorDogjani, Agron
dc.contributor.authorDorj, Gereltuya
dc.contributor.authorDortet, Laurent
dc.contributor.authorDuane, Therese M.
dc.contributor.authorElmangory, Mutasim M.
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:29:36.271730681Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:29:36.271730681Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractBackground: Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) have been promoted to optimize antimicrobial usage and patient outcomes, and to reduce the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant organisms. However, the best strategies for an ASP are not definitively established and are likely to vary based on local culture, policy, and routine clinical practice, and probably limited resources in middle-income countries. The aim of this study is to evaluate structures and resources of antimicrobial stewardship teams (ASTs) in surgical departments from different regions of the world. Methods: A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted in 2016 on 173 physicians who participated in the AGORA (Antimicrobials: A Global Alliance for Optimizing their Rational Use in Intra-Abdominal Infections) project and on 658 international experts in the fields of ASPs, infection control, and infections in surgery. Results: The response rate was 19.4%. One hundred fifty-six (98.7%) participants stated their hospital had a multidisciplinary AST. The median number of physicians working inside the team was five [interquartile range 4-6]. An infectious disease specialist, a microbiologist and an infection control specialist were, respectively, present in 80.1, 76.3, and 67.9% of the ASTs. A surgeon was a component in 59.0% of cases and was significantly more likely to be present in university hospitals (89.5%, p < 0.05) compared to community teaching (83.3%) and community hospitals (66.7%). Protocols for pre-operative prophylaxis and for antimicrobial treatment of surgical infections were respectively implemented in 96.2 and 82.3% of the hospitals. The majority of the surgical departments implemented both persuasive and restrictive interventions (72.8%). The most common types of interventions in surgical departments were dissemination of educational materials (62.5%), expert approval (61.0%), audit and feedback (55.1%), educational outreach (53.7%), and compulsory order forms (51.5%). Conclusion: The survey showed a heterogeneous organization of ASPs worldwide, demonstrating the necessity of a multidisciplinary and collaborative approach in the battle against antimicrobial resistance in surgical infections, and the importance of educational efforts towards this goal. © 2017 The Author(s).
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, NIMHD, (G12MD007595); National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, NIMHD
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13017-017-0145-2
dc.identifier.issn1749-7922
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC5540347
dc.identifier.pmid28775763
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85026663045
dc.identifier.startpage34
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/14805
dc.identifier.volume12
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Journal of Emergency Surgery
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAntibiotics
dc.subjectAntimicrobial stewardship
dc.subjectInfections
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.subjectAnti-Infective Agents
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studies
dc.subjectGlobal Health
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIntraabdominal Infections
dc.subjectPostoperative Complications
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subjectantiinfective agent
dc.subjectabdominal infection
dc.subjectcross-sectional study
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectpostoperative complication
dc.subjectprocedures
dc.subjectquestionnaire
dc.subjecttrends
dc.titleThe Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery: Defining a model for antimicrobial stewardship-results from an international cross-sectional survey
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus57
rdl.departmentDepartment of General Surgery, Erzincan University, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan, Turkey.
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED