Some Criteria to Consider on the Name of Scientific Objectivity While Approaching the Objective and Subjective Religious Reality Areas of the Religious Psychologist

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Psychology, which lasted for many years under the roof of Philosophy, became an independent discipline when Wundt founded his first psychology laboratory in 1879. This independence is not enough to be a branch of science like physics, which psychology desires because it expresses spiritual sciences as a concept. For this reason, modern psychology has pushed her out of her main field of study because of the metaphysical nature of the concept of soul. Modern psychology has not only made the concept of soul the subject of study as visible or measurable features of human but has also excluded religious subjects from the study area with the claim that it is against scientificness. This situation led to the rejection of the fields of objective religious reality and subjective religious reality, which are the main subjects of the study of religion, on the grounds that it cannot be the subject of scientific research. The objective of this study is to discuss the approach of the approach of the religion psychologist to the objective religious reality, the subjective religious reality, and subjective religious meaning.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/16302Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29288/ilted.456787Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKandemir, Fatih
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:33:51.037756436Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:33:51.037756436Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractPsychology, which lasted for many years under the roof of Philosophy, became an independent discipline when Wundt founded his first psychology laboratory in 1879. This independence is not enough to be a branch of science like physics, which psychology desires because it expresses spiritual sciences as a concept. For this reason, modern psychology has pushed her out of her main field of study because of the metaphysical nature of the concept of soul. Modern psychology has not only made the concept of soul the subject of study as visible or measurable features of human but has also excluded religious subjects from the study area with the claim that it is against scientificness. This situation led to the rejection of the fields of objective religious reality and subjective religious reality, which are the main subjects of the study of religion, on the grounds that it cannot be the subject of scientific research. The objective of this study is to discuss the approach of the approach of the religion psychologist to the objective religious reality, the subjective religious reality, and subjective religious meaning.
dc.identifier.doi10.29288/ilted.456787
dc.identifier.eissn2602-3946
dc.identifier.endpage361
dc.identifier.issn2458-7508
dc.identifier.issue50
dc.identifier.startpage343
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/16302
dc.identifier.volume0
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000456342900014
dc.language.isotr
dc.publisherAVES
dc.relation.ispartofILAHIYAT TETKIKLERI DERGISI-JOURNAL OF ILAHIYAT RESEARCHES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectPsychology of Religion
dc.subjectObjective Religious Reality
dc.subjectSubjective Religious Reality
dc.subjectSubjective Religious Meaning
dc.subjectScientific Objectivity
dc.subjectReligion
dc.titleSome Criteria to Consider on the Name of Scientific Objectivity While Approaching the Objective and Subjective Religious Reality Areas of the Religious Psychologist
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.trdizin0
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.departmentERZİNCAN BİNALİ YILDIRIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN
rdl.wos.indexEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)