Burnout and Psychological Resilience in Nurses: A Structural Equality Modeling

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Background: It is important to identify the factors that affect burnout and examining psychological resilience, which is thought to have a positive impact on burnout. Aim: This cross-sectional study was conducted to examine the effects of psychological resilience and other factors on nurses’ burnout levels. Method: Data were collected between June and August 2020 using the snowball sampling method. The sample consisted of 275 nurses working in different facilities across our country. The data collection instruments used were the “Demographic Characteristics Form,” the “Brief Psychological Resilience Scale,” and the “Burnout Scale Short Form.” Data were analyzed with numbers, averages, percentages, and the structural equation model explaining the relationship between the observed/hidden variables. Results: The goodness-of-fit values of the revised model for estimating factors influencing burnout in the nursing population were acceptable (χ2 = 252.41, χ2/df = 2.25, NFI (Normed Fit Index) = 0.92, TLI (Tucker Leis Index) = 0.94, CFI (Comparative Fit Index) = 0.95, GFI (Goodness of Fit Index) = 0.90, AGFI (Adjustment Goodness of Fit Index) = 0.88, RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation) = 0.07, RMR (Root Mean Square Residual) = 0.14). Psychological resilience (t = −6.913; P < .001) in the model had 53% effect on burnout, while job satisfaction (t = −4.815; P < .001) had 31% effect. As can be seen, the level of “psychological resilience” and “job satisfaction” affected burnout in nurses by 59%. As the psychological resilience and job satisfaction levels of nurses increased, the burnout level decreased. However, the gender, age, marital status, family type, seniority, and educational status variables did not contribute significantly to the model. Conclusion: According to the model obtained from the study, it was found that psychological resilience and job satisfaction were variables that influenced burnout levels in the opposite direction. Efforts can be made to enhance the psychological resilience of nurses.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/18259Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5152/jern.2022.00908Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKanbay, Yalçın
dc.contributor.authorFIRAT, Meryem
dc.contributor.authorGökmen, Burcu Demir
dc.contributor.authorUtkan, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:56:28.296387959Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:56:28.296387959Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractBackground: It is important to identify the factors that affect burnout and examining psychological resilience, which is thought to have a positive impact on burnout. Aim: This cross-sectional study was conducted to examine the effects of psychological resilience and other factors on nurses’ burnout levels. Method: Data were collected between June and August 2020 using the snowball sampling method. The sample consisted of 275 nurses working in different facilities across our country. The data collection instruments used were the “Demographic Characteristics Form,” the “Brief Psychological Resilience Scale,” and the “Burnout Scale Short Form.” Data were analyzed with numbers, averages, percentages, and the structural equation model explaining the relationship between the observed/hidden variables. Results: The goodness-of-fit values of the revised model for estimating factors influencing burnout in the nursing population were acceptable (χ2 = 252.41, χ2/df = 2.25, NFI (Normed Fit Index) = 0.92, TLI (Tucker Leis Index) = 0.94, CFI (Comparative Fit Index) = 0.95, GFI (Goodness of Fit Index) = 0.90, AGFI (Adjustment Goodness of Fit Index) = 0.88, RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation) = 0.07, RMR (Root Mean Square Residual) = 0.14). Psychological resilience (t = −6.913; P < .001) in the model had 53% effect on burnout, while job satisfaction (t = −4.815; P < .001) had 31% effect. As can be seen, the level of “psychological resilience” and “job satisfaction” affected burnout in nurses by 59%. As the psychological resilience and job satisfaction levels of nurses increased, the burnout level decreased. However, the gender, age, marital status, family type, seniority, and educational status variables did not contribute significantly to the model. Conclusion: According to the model obtained from the study, it was found that psychological resilience and job satisfaction were variables that influenced burnout levels in the opposite direction. Efforts can be made to enhance the psychological resilience of nurses.
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/jern.2022.00908
dc.identifier.eissn2757-9204
dc.identifier.endpage402
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.startpage396
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/18259
dc.identifier.volume19
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of education and research in nursing (Online)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri ve Hizmetleri
dc.subjectPsikoloji
dc.titleBurnout and Psychological Resilience in Nurses: A Structural Equality Modeling
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.trdizin1
rdl.departmentARTVİN ÇORUH ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.departmentERZİNCAN BİNALİ YILDIRIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.departmentAĞRI İBRAHİM ÇEÇEN ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.departmentKAFKAS ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN