Nature’s Guidance: Employing Bio-inspired Algorithm and Data-Driven Model for Simulating Monthly Maximum and Average Temperature Time Series in the Middle Black Sea Region of Türkiye
Özet
This study compares the performance of various models in predicting monthly maximum and average temperatures across three distinct regions: Samsun, Amasya, and Çorum. The evaluated models include Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm coupled with ANN (SFLA-ANN), Firefly Algorithm coupled with ANN (FFA-ANN), and Genetic Algorithm coupled with ANN (GA-ANN). In setting up the models, the dataset was divided into 70% for training and 30% for testing, and the outputs of the models were evaluated using various graphical and statistical indicators. The model with the smallest root mean square error (RMSE) value was selected for the maximum and average temperature predictions. Accordingly, for maximum and average temperature predictions, SFLA-ANN (RMSE of 2.93) and GA-ANN (RMSE of 3.55) in Samsun, GA-ANN (RMSE of 2.91) and GA-ANN (RMSE of 2.50) in Amasya and GA-ANN (RMSE of 2.97) and GA-ANN (RMSE of 2.50) in Çorum performed better than the other models, respectively. In addition, for the maximum temperature prediction with the highest accuracy, the R2 value of the SFLA-ANN model in Samsun was 0.89. In contrast, the R2 values of the GA-ANN model in Amasya and Çorum were determined as 0.91 and 0.91, respectively. Similarly, it was observed that the R2 values of the GA-ANN model for the average temperature prediction with the highest accuracy at Samsun, Amasya and Çorum stations were 0.78, 0.92 and 0.92, respectively. Overall, the GA-ANN consistently demonstrated superior performance in predicting both maximum and average temperatures across all three regions, as evidenced by its consistently low RMSE values. These findings provide valuable insights into selecting effective models for temperature prediction tasks in different geographical regions. © The Author(s) 2025.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Tam Kayıt
| Alan | Değer | Dil |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Katipoğlu, Okan Mert | |
| dc.contributor.author | Terzioğlu, Zeynep Özge | |
| dc.contributor.author | Zerouali, Bilel | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-18T20:26:09.897613187Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-18T20:26:09.897613187Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study compares the performance of various models in predicting monthly maximum and average temperatures across three distinct regions: Samsun, Amasya, and Çorum. The evaluated models include Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm coupled with ANN (SFLA-ANN), Firefly Algorithm coupled with ANN (FFA-ANN), and Genetic Algorithm coupled with ANN (GA-ANN). In setting up the models, the dataset was divided into 70% for training and 30% for testing, and the outputs of the models were evaluated using various graphical and statistical indicators. The model with the smallest root mean square error (RMSE) value was selected for the maximum and average temperature predictions. Accordingly, for maximum and average temperature predictions, SFLA-ANN (RMSE of 2.93) and GA-ANN (RMSE of 3.55) in Samsun, GA-ANN (RMSE of 2.91) and GA-ANN (RMSE of 2.50) in Amasya and GA-ANN (RMSE of 2.97) and GA-ANN (RMSE of 2.50) in Çorum performed better than the other models, respectively. In addition, for the maximum temperature prediction with the highest accuracy, the R2 value of the SFLA-ANN model in Samsun was 0.89. In contrast, the R2 values of the GA-ANN model in Amasya and Çorum were determined as 0.91 and 0.91, respectively. Similarly, it was observed that the R2 values of the GA-ANN model for the average temperature prediction with the highest accuracy at Samsun, Amasya and Çorum stations were 0.78, 0.92 and 0.92, respectively. Overall, the GA-ANN consistently demonstrated superior performance in predicting both maximum and average temperatures across all three regions, as evidenced by its consistently low RMSE values. These findings provide valuable insights into selecting effective models for temperature prediction tasks in different geographical regions. © The Author(s) 2025. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Open access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of T\u00FCrkiye (T\u00DCB\u0130TAK). No funding was received to conduct this study. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00024-025-03678-2 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1420-9136 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 901 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0033-4553 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 2 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85217799285 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 877 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11064 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 182 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001420116700001 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Birkhauser | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Pure and Applied Geophysics | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.subject | Different geographical regions | |
| dc.subject | Performance | |
| dc.subject | Shuffled frog leaping algorithm | |
| dc.subject | Temperatures | |
| dc.subject | Black Sea | |
| dc.subject | Turkey | |
| dc.subject | Mean square error | |
| dc.subject | Neural networks | |
| dc.subject | Prediction models | |
| dc.subject | Artificial neural network modeling | |
| dc.subject | Different geographical region | |
| dc.subject | Error values | |
| dc.subject | High-accuracy | |
| dc.subject | Neural-networks | |
| dc.subject | Root mean square errors | |
| dc.subject | Shuffled frog leaping | |
| dc.subject | Temperature prediction | |
| dc.subject | algorithm | |
| dc.subject | artificial neural network | |
| dc.subject | geographical region | |
| dc.subject | temperature | |
| dc.subject | time series | |
| dc.subject | Genetic algorithms | |
| dc.title | Nature’s Guidance: Employing Bio-inspired Algorithm and Data-Driven Model for Simulating Monthly Maximum and Average Temperature Time Series in the Middle Black Sea Region of Türkiye | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| rdl.citation.scopus | 6 | |
| rdl.citation.wos | 5 | |
| rdl.oa.status | gold | |
| rdl.source.index | SCOPUS | |
| rdl.source.index | WOS | |
| rdl.wos.index | Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) |
