Patient vs. physician narratives on refractive surgery in Turkish YouTube videos: a comparative reflexive thematic analysis

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Correctable refractive errors are a major, preventable cause of visual impairment. Refractive surgery is widely promoted online, yet how Turkish-language YouTube videos frame benefits, risks, recovery, and long-term outcomes—and how this framing differs between patient and physician narrators—remains underexplored. We aimed to qualitatively compare patient- and physician-generated Turkish-language YouTube videos on refractive surgery and to describe audience engagement. We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke) of 64 publicly available videos (29 patient, 35 physician) meeting predefined criteria (Turkish; primarily refractive surgery; ≥1 min; ≥1,000 views; ≥240p). Searches were performed on 15 July 2025 using predefined search strings. Videos were transcribed verbatim and inductively coded in NVivo by two researchers. Between-group differences in engagement metrics were assessed with Mann–Whitney U tests, with a one-video-per-channel sensitivity analysis to address potential clustering. Patient narratives foregrounded lived experience (decision-making, perioperative discomfort, postoperative visual fluctuations, and symptoms such as dry eye and glare/halos) and often raised concerns about commercialization. Physician narratives emphasized candidacy assessment, procedure selection, recovery timelines, and risk mitigation. In the one-video-per-channel sensitivity analysis (patient n = 27; physician n = 23), patient videos received more likes (median 300 [IQR 1,639] vs. 59 [269], p = 0.009) and showed a higher like-to-view ratio (0.013 [0.01] vs. 0.006 [0.01], p < 0.001), whereas view counts were not significantly different (24,000 [98,900] vs. 18,000 [48,500], p = 0.224). Turkish-language YouTube narratives share experiential touchpoints but diverge systematically in how risks, commercialization, and expectations are framed by patients versus physicians. Findings support the need for balanced, accurate, and discoverable patient-facing materials tailored to platform dynamics. © The Author(s) 2026.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10357Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41997-zYayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorGürsoy, Nurcan
dc.contributor.authorGürsoy, Ersan
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:25:35.346949836Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:25:35.346949836Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractCorrectable refractive errors are a major, preventable cause of visual impairment. Refractive surgery is widely promoted online, yet how Turkish-language YouTube videos frame benefits, risks, recovery, and long-term outcomes—and how this framing differs between patient and physician narrators—remains underexplored. We aimed to qualitatively compare patient- and physician-generated Turkish-language YouTube videos on refractive surgery and to describe audience engagement. We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke) of 64 publicly available videos (29 patient, 35 physician) meeting predefined criteria (Turkish; primarily refractive surgery; ≥1 min; ≥1,000 views; ≥240p). Searches were performed on 15 July 2025 using predefined search strings. Videos were transcribed verbatim and inductively coded in NVivo by two researchers. Between-group differences in engagement metrics were assessed with Mann–Whitney U tests, with a one-video-per-channel sensitivity analysis to address potential clustering. Patient narratives foregrounded lived experience (decision-making, perioperative discomfort, postoperative visual fluctuations, and symptoms such as dry eye and glare/halos) and often raised concerns about commercialization. Physician narratives emphasized candidacy assessment, procedure selection, recovery timelines, and risk mitigation. In the one-video-per-channel sensitivity analysis (patient n = 27; physician n = 23), patient videos received more likes (median 300 [IQR 1,639] vs. 59 [269], p = 0.009) and showed a higher like-to-view ratio (0.013 [0.01] vs. 0.006 [0.01], p < 0.001), whereas view counts were not significantly different (24,000 [98,900] vs. 18,000 [48,500], p = 0.224). Turkish-language YouTube narratives share experiential touchpoints but diverge systematically in how risks, commercialization, and expectations are framed by patients versus physicians. Findings support the need for balanced, accurate, and discoverable patient-facing materials tailored to platform dynamics. © The Author(s) 2026.
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-026-41997-z
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC13043931
dc.identifier.pmid41764352
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105034927584
dc.identifier.startpage11002
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10357
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001732319800001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherNature Research
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Reports
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectLASIK
dc.subjectPatient narratives
dc.subjectPhysician narratives
dc.subjectQualitative research
dc.subjectRefractive surgery
dc.subjectSMILE
dc.subjectYouTube
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectNarration
dc.subjectPhysicians
dc.subjectRefractive Surgical Procedures
dc.subjectSocial Media
dc.subjectTurkey
dc.subjectVideo Recording
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectphysician
dc.subjectturkey (bird)
dc.subjectverbal communication
dc.subjectvideorecording
dc.titlePatient vs. physician narratives on refractive surgery in Turkish YouTube videos: a comparative reflexive thematic analysis
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.departmentDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mengücek Gazi Training and Research Hospital, Erzincan, Turkey. | Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, 24100, Erzincan, Turkey. ersan.gursoy@erzincan.edu.tr.
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)