Mediatorship in the clash of hegemonic and counter publics The curious case of Heartstopper in Turkey

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

This study discusses how the publication of Alice Oseman’s translation of the Heartstopper (Kalp Çarpıntısı) series in Turkey became a case of multiple mediatorship, from the stigmatization of the series as “propaganda of heresy” and the o f c i a l restrictions of its sales to the support for its dissemination among the target audience. Closely relating to the mediation processes that turn sanctions into statements against the LGBTQ+ community or springboards for solidarity in support of equality and inclusion, the concept of multiple mediatorship embodies mediators or agents acting for or against the dissemination of the series among Turkish readers. In that vein, this study ofers a nuanced understanding of how mediation cannot simply be deemed a collaborative act enabled by alliance, but, rather, of how it involves a clash of multiple mediators who are in confict in the public sphere. © 2023 John Benjamins Publishing Company. All rights reserved.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11707Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.23014.abdYayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorAbdal, Goksenin
dc.contributor.authorYaman, Busra
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:26:43.046437531Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:26:43.046437531Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractThis study discusses how the publication of Alice Oseman’s translation of the Heartstopper (Kalp Çarpıntısı) series in Turkey became a case of multiple mediatorship, from the stigmatization of the series as “propaganda of heresy” and the o f c i a l restrictions of its sales to the support for its dissemination among the target audience. Closely relating to the mediation processes that turn sanctions into statements against the LGBTQ+ community or springboards for solidarity in support of equality and inclusion, the concept of multiple mediatorship embodies mediators or agents acting for or against the dissemination of the series among Turkish readers. In that vein, this study ofers a nuanced understanding of how mediation cannot simply be deemed a collaborative act enabled by alliance, but, rather, of how it involves a clash of multiple mediators who are in confict in the public sphere. © 2023 John Benjamins Publishing Company. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1075/tis.23014.abd
dc.identifier.eissn1876-2700
dc.identifier.endpage300
dc.identifier.issn1932-2798
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85180771216
dc.identifier.startpage280
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11707
dc.identifier.volume18
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001156549700002
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company
dc.relation.ispartofTranslation and Interpreting Studies
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAlice Oseman
dc.subjectcensorship
dc.subjectHeartstopper
dc.subjectmultiple mediatorship
dc.subjectyoung adult queer fction
dc.titleMediatorship in the clash of hegemonic and counter publics The curious case of Heartstopper in Turkey
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus2
rdl.citation.wos2
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexSocial Science Citation Index (SSCI)
rdl.wos.indexArts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI)