Tip–neck distance ratio as a novel predictor for failure in cephalomedullary nailing of unstable trochanteric fractures (UTF)

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Objectives: Intertrochanteric femur fractures (ITFF) are frequently fixed with proximal femoral nailing (PFN), and a common cause of fixation failure is cut-out of the lag screws. In the literature, many factors have been defined to determine the failure risk, including the tip–apex distance (TAD), calcar-referenced tip–apex distance (CalTAD), the Cleveland zone and Parker's ratio. In this study, a novel technique is described which favors infero-posterior placement of the lag screw and predicts failure risk for PFN. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tip–neck distance ratio as a factor for the prediction of cut-out after PFN of ITFF. Materials and methods: A retrospective evaluation was made of the data of 125 patients applied with PFN for ITFF between October 2016 and September 2019. The occurrence of mechanical complications was analyzed in relation to age, gender, fracture side, American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification, fracture classification, reduction quality, bone quality, Cleveland zone, Parker’s ratio, TAD, CalTAD and the TNDR. Results: A total of 125 patients, including 16 with mechanical complications, were suitable for full analysis. In the univariate analysis, reduction quality (p = 0.003), the TAD (p = 0.048) and the TNDR (p = 0.030) were statistically associated with mechanical complications (p < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, good quality of reduction reduced risk of mechanical failure (p = 0.011) and the TNDR (p < 0.001) indicated that these were two independent factors affecting mechanical complications. Conclusion: The results of this study provide clinical evidence that the TNDR is a predictor for cut-out risk. Placement of the lag screw posterior and inferior reduces the risk of mechanical complications. Level of evidence: Level 3. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12629Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03999-6Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorÇepni, Şahin
dc.contributor.authorSubaşı, İzzet Özay
dc.contributor.authorŞahin, Ali
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, İbrahim
dc.contributor.authorFırat, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorKılıçarslan, Kasım
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:27:30.606093179Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:27:30.606093179Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Intertrochanteric femur fractures (ITFF) are frequently fixed with proximal femoral nailing (PFN), and a common cause of fixation failure is cut-out of the lag screws. In the literature, many factors have been defined to determine the failure risk, including the tip–apex distance (TAD), calcar-referenced tip–apex distance (CalTAD), the Cleveland zone and Parker's ratio. In this study, a novel technique is described which favors infero-posterior placement of the lag screw and predicts failure risk for PFN. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tip–neck distance ratio as a factor for the prediction of cut-out after PFN of ITFF. Materials and methods: A retrospective evaluation was made of the data of 125 patients applied with PFN for ITFF between October 2016 and September 2019. The occurrence of mechanical complications was analyzed in relation to age, gender, fracture side, American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification, fracture classification, reduction quality, bone quality, Cleveland zone, Parker’s ratio, TAD, CalTAD and the TNDR. Results: A total of 125 patients, including 16 with mechanical complications, were suitable for full analysis. In the univariate analysis, reduction quality (p = 0.003), the TAD (p = 0.048) and the TNDR (p = 0.030) were statistically associated with mechanical complications (p < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, good quality of reduction reduced risk of mechanical failure (p = 0.011) and the TNDR (p < 0.001) indicated that these were two independent factors affecting mechanical complications. Conclusion: The results of this study provide clinical evidence that the TNDR is a predictor for cut-out risk. Placement of the lag screw posterior and inferior reduces the risk of mechanical complications. Level of evidence: Level 3. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00402-021-03999-6
dc.identifier.eissn1434-3916
dc.identifier.endpage2626
dc.identifier.issn0936-8051
dc.identifier.issue10
dc.identifier.pmid34146115
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85108263280
dc.identifier.startpage2619
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12629
dc.identifier.volume142
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000663529200001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectCut-out
dc.subjectIntertrochanteric femur fracture
dc.subjectPFNA
dc.subjectBone Nails
dc.subjectBone Screws
dc.subjectFracture Fixation, Intramedullary
dc.subjectHip Fractures
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectbone quality
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdisease classification
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectfemur intertrochanteric fracture
dc.subjecthip radiographic parameter
dc.subjecthip radiography
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectintramedullary nailing
dc.subjectmajor clinical study
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectpostoperative complication
dc.subjectpredictor variable
dc.subjectprospective study
dc.subjectretrospective study
dc.subjectrisk reduction
dc.subjectsurgical technique
dc.subjecttip neck distance ratio
dc.subjecttreatment failure
dc.titleTip–neck distance ratio as a novel predictor for failure in cephalomedullary nailing of unstable trochanteric fractures (UTF)
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus13
rdl.citation.wos14
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)