Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak in patients after oesophagectomy: the SEAL score

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Background: Anastomotic leak (AL) is a common but severe complication after oesophagectomy. It is unknown how to determine the severity of AL objectively at diagnosis. Determining leak severity may guide treatment decisions and improve future research. This study aimed to identify leak-related prognostic factors for mortality, and to develop a Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak (SEAL) score. Methods: This international, retrospective cohort study in 71 centres worldwide included patients with AL after oesophagectomy between 2011 and 2019. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. Leak-related prognostic factors were identified after adjusting for confounders and were included in multivariable logistic regression to develop the SEAL score. Four classes of leak severity (mild, moderate, severe, and critical) were defined based on the risk of 90-day mortality, and the score was validated internally. Results: Some 1509 patients with AL were included and the 90-day mortality rate was 11.7 per cent. Twelve leak-related prognostic factors were included in the SEAL score. The score showed good calibration and discrimination (c-index 0.77, 95 per cent c.i. 0.73 to 0.81). Higher classes of leak severity graded by the SEAL score were associated with a significant increase in duration of ICU stay, healing time, Comprehensive Complication Index score, and Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group classification. Conclusion: The SEAL score grades leak severity into four classes by combining 12 leak-related predictors and can be used to the assess severity of AL after oesophagectomy. © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12809Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac226Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorUbels, Sander
dc.contributor.authorVerstegen, Moniek H.P.
dc.contributor.authorKlarenbeek, Bastiaan R.
dc.contributor.authorBouwense, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorvan Berge Henegouwen, Mark I.
dc.contributor.authorDaams, Freek
dc.contributor.authorvan Det, Marc J.
dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, Ewen A.
dc.contributor.authorHaveman, Jan Willem
dc.contributor.authorHeisterkamp, Joos
dc.contributor.authorNieuwenhuijzen, Grard
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorSchouten, Jeroen
dc.contributor.authorSiersema, Peter D.
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Pritam
dc.contributor.authorWijnhoven, Bas
dc.contributor.authorHannink, Gerjon
dc.contributor.authorvan Workum, Frans
dc.contributor.authorRosman, Camiel
dc.contributor.authorMatthée, Eric
dc.contributor.authorSlootmans, Cettela A.M.
dc.contributor.authorUltee, Gijs
dc.contributor.authorGisbertz, Suzanne S.
dc.contributor.authorEshuis, Wietse J.
dc.contributor.authorKalff, Marianne C.
dc.contributor.authorFeenstra, Minke L.
dc.contributor.authorvan der Peet, Donald L.
dc.contributor.authorStam, Wessel T.
dc.contributor.authorVan Etten, Boudewijn
dc.contributor.authorPoelmann, Floris
dc.contributor.authorVuurberg, Nienke
dc.contributor.authorvan den Berg, Jan Willem
dc.contributor.authorMartijnse, Ingrid S.
dc.contributor.authorMatthijsen, Robert M.
dc.contributor.authorLuyer, Misha
dc.contributor.authorCurvers, Wout
dc.contributor.authorNieuwenhuijzen, Tom
dc.contributor.authorTaselaar, Annick E.
dc.contributor.authorKouwenhoven, Ewout A.
dc.contributor.authorLubbers, Merel
dc.contributor.authorSosef, Meindert
dc.contributor.authorLecot, Frederik
dc.contributor.authorGeraedts, Tessa C.M.
dc.contributor.authorvan Esser, Stijn
dc.contributor.authorDekker, Jan Willem T.
dc.contributor.authorvan den Wildenberg, Frits
dc.contributor.authorKelder, Wendy
dc.contributor.authorBaas, Peter C.
dc.contributor.authorde Haas, Job W.A.
dc.contributor.authorHartgrink, Henk H.
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:27:40.668420629Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:27:40.668420629Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractBackground: Anastomotic leak (AL) is a common but severe complication after oesophagectomy. It is unknown how to determine the severity of AL objectively at diagnosis. Determining leak severity may guide treatment decisions and improve future research. This study aimed to identify leak-related prognostic factors for mortality, and to develop a Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak (SEAL) score. Methods: This international, retrospective cohort study in 71 centres worldwide included patients with AL after oesophagectomy between 2011 and 2019. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. Leak-related prognostic factors were identified after adjusting for confounders and were included in multivariable logistic regression to develop the SEAL score. Four classes of leak severity (mild, moderate, severe, and critical) were defined based on the risk of 90-day mortality, and the score was validated internally. Results: Some 1509 patients with AL were included and the 90-day mortality rate was 11.7 per cent. Twelve leak-related prognostic factors were included in the SEAL score. The score showed good calibration and discrimination (c-index 0.77, 95 per cent c.i. 0.73 to 0.81). Higher classes of leak severity graded by the SEAL score were associated with a significant increase in duration of ICU stay, healing time, Comprehensive Complication Index score, and Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group classification. Conclusion: The SEAL score grades leak severity into four classes by combining 12 leak-related predictors and can be used to the assess severity of AL after oesophagectomy. © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe TENTACLE—Esophagus study received funding from Medtronic. The study was performed independently, and Medtronic had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript. Acknowledgements
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bjs/znac226
dc.identifier.endpage871
dc.identifier.issn0007-1323
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.pmid35759409
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85136908883
dc.identifier.startpage864
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12809
dc.identifier.volume109
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Surgery
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAnastomosis, Surgical
dc.subjectAnastomotic Leak
dc.subjectEsophageal Neoplasms
dc.subjectEsophagectomy
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLogistic Models
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectC reactive protein
dc.subjectaccuracy
dc.subjectaged
dc.subjectanastomosis leakage
dc.subjectArticle
dc.subjectcohort analysis
dc.subjectcomorbidity
dc.subjectdecision making
dc.subjectdisease severity
dc.subjectendoscopy
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectischemia
dc.subjectkidney failure
dc.subjectleukocyte count
dc.subjectlower esophagus sphincter
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmortality
dc.subjectmortality rate
dc.subjectoutcome assessment
dc.subjectprognosis
dc.subjectquality control
dc.subjectrespiratory failure
dc.titleSeverity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak in patients after oesophagectomy: the SEAL score
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus25
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS