Reliability analysis of circular footing by using GP and MPMR

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Circular footings are designed to bear a load of super structures. Studies have been done on the influence of soil properties on bearing capacity of shallow foundations. The use of circular foundation is practical in geotechnical engineering. During the design of circular footing, bearing capacity of soil is taken into consideration, and cohesion (c), unit weight (γ), and angle of internal friction (ϕ) are the most variable parameters. Reliability analysis is used frequently for the design of circular footing. Most of the authors have used first order second moment methods (FOSM). However, FOSM is a time-consuming method. Drawbacks of FOSM have been overcome by genetic programming (GP), minimax probability machine regression (MPMR). This article gives a distinct analysis between the developed MPMR based FOSM and GP-based FOSM. Copyright © 2021, IGI Global.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13448Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4018/ijamc.2021010101Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Rahul
dc.contributor.authorSamui, Pijush
dc.contributor.authorKumari, Sunita
dc.contributor.authorDalkilic, Yildirim Hüseyin
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:28:16.883395594Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:28:16.883395594Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractCircular footings are designed to bear a load of super structures. Studies have been done on the influence of soil properties on bearing capacity of shallow foundations. The use of circular foundation is practical in geotechnical engineering. During the design of circular footing, bearing capacity of soil is taken into consideration, and cohesion (c), unit weight (γ), and angle of internal friction (ϕ) are the most variable parameters. Reliability analysis is used frequently for the design of circular footing. Most of the authors have used first order second moment methods (FOSM). However, FOSM is a time-consuming method. Drawbacks of FOSM have been overcome by genetic programming (GP), minimax probability machine regression (MPMR). This article gives a distinct analysis between the developed MPMR based FOSM and GP-based FOSM. Copyright © 2021, IGI Global.
dc.identifier.doi10.4018/ijamc.2021010101
dc.identifier.eissn1947-8291
dc.identifier.endpage19
dc.identifier.issn1947-8283
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85097950851
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13448
dc.identifier.volume12
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000596761900001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIGI Global
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Applied Metaheuristic Computing
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectCircular footing
dc.subjectFOSM
dc.subjectGP
dc.subjectMPMR
dc.subjectReliability index
dc.subjectUltimate bearing capacity
dc.titleReliability analysis of circular footing by using GP and MPMR
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus4
rdl.citation.wos4
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)