Antibiotic Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated from Wound Specimens of Patients Admitted to the Orthopedics and Traumatology Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Objective: Staphylococcus aureus is a critical infectious agent in orthopedics and traumatology clinics. Treatment of S. aureus infec- tion is a problem, mainly due to the increased incidence of methicillin-resistant strains. This study aims to determine the antibiotic resistance of S. aureus strains isolated from wound samples of patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital’s orthopedics and trau- matology clinic. Methods: Patients admitted to our hospital’s orthopedics and traumatology clinic between January 2012 and November 2018 were included in this study and studied retrospectively. Participants in the study were required to have S. aureus strains present within their wounds. In addition to more traditional approaches, an automated microbiologic agent detection system known as VITEK® 2 Compact (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) was utilized in this study to identify S. aureus and determine its level of antibiotic resistance. Results: S. aureus was identified in 64 out of 298 wound samples, with a detection rate of 21.5%. Fifty-one S. aureus strains (79.7% of the total) were taken from the inpatient clinic, and the remaining 13 (20.3%) were obtained from the outpatient clinic. S. aureus strains were categorized as either methicillin-resistant S. aureus positive (19 patients, 29.7%) or methi cillin-susceptible S. aureus positive (45 patients, 70.3%), with the majority being methicillin-susceptible S. aureus positive. Conclusion: We found out that among methicillin-resistant S. aureus positive patients, vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, tigecy- cline, and daptomycin were effective antibiotic agents for the treatment. Also, methicillin-resistant S. aureus positive patients were resistant to penicillin, rifampicin, tetracycline, and erythromycin. This study detected methicillin resistance as a significant issue, and S. aureus strains antibiotic resistance in our study population was comparable to previous research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/17851Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5152/abcr.2023.22126Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorkarakeçili, faruk
dc.contributor.authorGÜR, VOLKAN
dc.contributor.authorÇIKMAN, AYTEKİN
dc.contributor.authorkockara, nizamettin
dc.contributor.authorYapici, Furkan
dc.contributor.authorGülhan, Barış
dc.contributor.authorsubaşı, özay
dc.contributor.authorGökgöz, Mehmet Burak
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:49:46.699182056Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:49:46.699182056Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractObjective: Staphylococcus aureus is a critical infectious agent in orthopedics and traumatology clinics. Treatment of S. aureus infec- tion is a problem, mainly due to the increased incidence of methicillin-resistant strains. This study aims to determine the antibiotic resistance of S. aureus strains isolated from wound samples of patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital’s orthopedics and trau- matology clinic. Methods: Patients admitted to our hospital’s orthopedics and traumatology clinic between January 2012 and November 2018 were included in this study and studied retrospectively. Participants in the study were required to have S. aureus strains present within their wounds. In addition to more traditional approaches, an automated microbiologic agent detection system known as VITEK® 2 Compact (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) was utilized in this study to identify S. aureus and determine its level of antibiotic resistance. Results: S. aureus was identified in 64 out of 298 wound samples, with a detection rate of 21.5%. Fifty-one S. aureus strains (79.7% of the total) were taken from the inpatient clinic, and the remaining 13 (20.3%) were obtained from the outpatient clinic. S. aureus strains were categorized as either methicillin-resistant S. aureus positive (19 patients, 29.7%) or methi cillin-susceptible S. aureus positive (45 patients, 70.3%), with the majority being methicillin-susceptible S. aureus positive. Conclusion: We found out that among methicillin-resistant S. aureus positive patients, vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, tigecy- cline, and daptomycin were effective antibiotic agents for the treatment. Also, methicillin-resistant S. aureus positive patients were resistant to penicillin, rifampicin, tetracycline, and erythromycin. This study detected methicillin resistance as a significant issue, and S. aureus strains antibiotic resistance in our study population was comparable to previous research.
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/abcr.2023.22126
dc.identifier.eissn2687-4482
dc.identifier.endpage354
dc.identifier.issn2687-4520
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage350
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/17851
dc.identifier.volume5
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Basic and Clinical Research
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectTıbbi Araştırmalar Deneysel
dc.subjectPatoloji
dc.subjectMikrobiyoloji
dc.subjectTıbbi Laboratuar Teknolojisi
dc.subjectOrtopedi
dc.titleAntibiotic Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated from Wound Specimens of Patients Admitted to the Orthopedics and Traumatology Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.trdizin0
rdl.departmentERZİNCAN BİNALİ YILDIRIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.departmentÖzel Kuruluş
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN