Rise of single-case experimental designs: A historical overview of the necessity of single-case methodology

Review ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Windelband ([1894]1980) advocated that two approaches are used for accumulating scientific knowledge. The first is the idiographic approach that derives knowledge from a single unit, and the second is the nomothetic approach that accumulates knowledge of a group. Given these two approaches, the former matches case studies while the latter is more appropriate with experimental group studies. Scientists have criticized both methodologies for their various limitations. Later, the single-case methodology emerged as an alternative that potentially allays these limitations. In this context, this narrative review aims to describe the historical roots of single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) that have emerged to eliminate the tension of nomothetic and idiographic approaches over time. First, the review focuses on the emergence of SCEDs. Second, the strengths and challenges of SCEDs are reviewed, including those to address the limitations of group experimental and case studies. Third, the use and analyses of SCEDs are outlined, considering their current status. Fourth, this narrative review continues to delineate the dissemination of SCEDs in the modern scientific world. As a result, SCEDs can be evaluated as a method that has the potential to overcome the issues encountered in case description and group experimental research. Thus, that helps accumulate nomothetic and idiographic knowledge in determining evidence-based practices. © 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11554Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Orhan
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:26:35.190479553Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:26:35.190479553Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractWindelband ([1894]1980) advocated that two approaches are used for accumulating scientific knowledge. The first is the idiographic approach that derives knowledge from a single unit, and the second is the nomothetic approach that accumulates knowledge of a group. Given these two approaches, the former matches case studies while the latter is more appropriate with experimental group studies. Scientists have criticized both methodologies for their various limitations. Later, the single-case methodology emerged as an alternative that potentially allays these limitations. In this context, this narrative review aims to describe the historical roots of single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) that have emerged to eliminate the tension of nomothetic and idiographic approaches over time. First, the review focuses on the emergence of SCEDs. Second, the strengths and challenges of SCEDs are reviewed, including those to address the limitations of group experimental and case studies. Third, the use and analyses of SCEDs are outlined, considering their current status. Fourth, this narrative review continues to delineate the dissemination of SCEDs in the modern scientific world. As a result, SCEDs can be evaluated as a method that has the potential to overcome the issues encountered in case description and group experimental research. Thus, that helps accumulate nomothetic and idiographic knowledge in determining evidence-based practices. © 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09602011.2023.2181191
dc.identifier.eissn1464-0694
dc.identifier.endpage334
dc.identifier.issn0960-2011
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pmid36811612
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85148643237
dc.identifier.startpage301
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/11554
dc.identifier.volume34
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000935097200001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.relation.ispartofNeuropsychological Rehabilitation
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectEvidence-based practices
dc.subjectHistorical overview
dc.subjectIdiographic
dc.subjectNomothetic
dc.subjectSingle-case experimental designs
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectKnowledge
dc.subjectResearch Design
dc.subjectcase report
dc.subjectclinical article
dc.subjectexperimental design
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectnarrative
dc.subjectreview
dc.subjecttension
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.titleRise of single-case experimental designs: A historical overview of the necessity of single-case methodology
dc.typeReview Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus19
rdl.citation.wos14
rdl.departmentFaculty of Education, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan, Türkiye.
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexPUBMED
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)