Geoid undulation prediction using ANNs (RBFNN and GRNN), multiple linear regression (MLR), and interpolation methods: A comparative study; [Predicción de ondulación geoide con Redes Neuronales Artificiales (base radial y regresión generalizada), regresión lineal múltiple y métodos de interpolación: estudio comparativo]

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

This study evaluated different methods for geoid undulation prediction and included two types of artificial neural networks (ANNs)-the radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) and the generalized regression neural network (GRNN)-as well as conventional methods including multiple linear regression (MLR) and ten different interpolation techniques. In this work, k-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate the model and its behavior on the independent dataset. With this validation method, each of a k number of groups has the chance to be divided into training and testing data. The performances of the methods were evaluated in terms of the root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE), correlation coefficient (R2), and using graphical in-dicators. The evaluation of the performance of the datasets obtained using cross-validation was performed in two ways. When the method having the minimum error result was accepted as the most appropriate method, the natural neighbor (NN) gave better results than the other methods (RMSE = 0.142 m, MAE = 0.097 m, NSE = 0.98986, and R2 = 0.99011). On the other hand, it was observed that on average, the GRNN exhibited the best performance (RMSE = 0.185 m, MAE = 0.137 m, NSE = 0.98229, and R2 = 0.98249). © 2021, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. All rights reserved.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13454Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v25n4.91195Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKonakoglu, Berkant
dc.contributor.authorAkar, Alper
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:28:17.160770008Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:28:17.160770008Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated different methods for geoid undulation prediction and included two types of artificial neural networks (ANNs)-the radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) and the generalized regression neural network (GRNN)-as well as conventional methods including multiple linear regression (MLR) and ten different interpolation techniques. In this work, k-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate the model and its behavior on the independent dataset. With this validation method, each of a k number of groups has the chance to be divided into training and testing data. The performances of the methods were evaluated in terms of the root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE), correlation coefficient (R2), and using graphical in-dicators. The evaluation of the performance of the datasets obtained using cross-validation was performed in two ways. When the method having the minimum error result was accepted as the most appropriate method, the natural neighbor (NN) gave better results than the other methods (RMSE = 0.142 m, MAE = 0.097 m, NSE = 0.98986, and R2 = 0.99011). On the other hand, it was observed that on average, the GRNN exhibited the best performance (RMSE = 0.185 m, MAE = 0.137 m, NSE = 0.98229, and R2 = 0.98249). © 2021, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.15446/esrj.v25n4.91195
dc.identifier.eissn2339-3459
dc.identifier.endpage382
dc.identifier.issn1794-6190
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85124670293
dc.identifier.startpage371
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/13454
dc.identifier.volume25
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000754189600001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia
dc.relation.ispartofEarth Sciences Research Journal
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectGeneralized regression neural network (GRNN)
dc.subjectGeoid determination
dc.subjectInterpolation methods
dc.subjectMultiple linear regression (MLR)
dc.subjectRadial basis function neural network (RBFNN)
dc.subjectartificial nest
dc.subjectartificial neural network
dc.subjectdata set
dc.subjectdetection method
dc.subjectinterpolation
dc.titleGeoid undulation prediction using ANNs (RBFNN and GRNN), multiple linear regression (MLR), and interpolation methods: A comparative study; [Predicción de ondulación geoide con Redes Neuronales Artificiales (base radial y regresión generalizada), regresión lineal múltiple y métodos de interpolación: estudio comparativo]
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus6
rdl.citation.wos4
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)