Comparison of Carbapenem Inactivation Test and Modified Hodge Test in Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Objective: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae are reported increasingly everywhere throughout the world. Rapid and simple detection of carbapenemase-producing strains has become imperative because of the use of carbapenems in the treatment of extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections. In this study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic value of modified Hodge test and carbapenem inactivation test for Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates producing carbapenemase, verified by molecular method, and to evaluate their use in routine laboratory practice. Methods: 64 K. pneumoniae strains which have shown resistance gene causing carbapenem resistance by the polymerase chain reaction, and 40 ESBL-negative and carbapenem-susceptible K. pneumoniae strains have been included in this study. Meropenem, imipenem and ertapenem were studied separately in modified Hodge test and carbapenem inactivation test was performed for all strains. Carbapenem inactivation test was evaluated at the 6th hour for preliminary decision and at the 24th hour for the final decision. Results: The sensitivity of the modified Hodge test using meropenem, imipenem and ertapenem for detecting presence of carbapenemase was 60.9%, 62.5% and 68.8%, respectively. In the carbapenem inactivation test with meropenem, imipenem and ertapenem, sensitivity to determine carbapenemase production was 32.8%, 75% and 96.9% after 6 hours, and 64.1%, 84.4% and 96.9% after 24 hours, respectively. There were no positive results in modified Hodge and carbapenem inactivation tests with K. pneumoniae strains that were ESBL-negative and carbapenem-susceptible. Conclusions: As a result, molecular tests are essential to detect carbapenem encoding genes. However, we believe that the carbapenemase inactivation test is a better alternative to the modified Hodge test to detect carbapenemase production in laboratories without adequate infrastructure.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/16490Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5152/kd.2018.54Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorDavarci, Ismail
dc.contributor.authorKocoglu, Mucahide Esra
dc.contributor.authorZengin, Ferhat
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:36:22.378739538Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:36:22.378739538Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractObjective: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae are reported increasingly everywhere throughout the world. Rapid and simple detection of carbapenemase-producing strains has become imperative because of the use of carbapenems in the treatment of extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections. In this study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic value of modified Hodge test and carbapenem inactivation test for Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates producing carbapenemase, verified by molecular method, and to evaluate their use in routine laboratory practice. Methods: 64 K. pneumoniae strains which have shown resistance gene causing carbapenem resistance by the polymerase chain reaction, and 40 ESBL-negative and carbapenem-susceptible K. pneumoniae strains have been included in this study. Meropenem, imipenem and ertapenem were studied separately in modified Hodge test and carbapenem inactivation test was performed for all strains. Carbapenem inactivation test was evaluated at the 6th hour for preliminary decision and at the 24th hour for the final decision. Results: The sensitivity of the modified Hodge test using meropenem, imipenem and ertapenem for detecting presence of carbapenemase was 60.9%, 62.5% and 68.8%, respectively. In the carbapenem inactivation test with meropenem, imipenem and ertapenem, sensitivity to determine carbapenemase production was 32.8%, 75% and 96.9% after 6 hours, and 64.1%, 84.4% and 96.9% after 24 hours, respectively. There were no positive results in modified Hodge and carbapenem inactivation tests with K. pneumoniae strains that were ESBL-negative and carbapenem-susceptible. Conclusions: As a result, molecular tests are essential to detect carbapenem encoding genes. However, we believe that the carbapenemase inactivation test is a better alternative to the modified Hodge test to detect carbapenemase production in laboratories without adequate infrastructure.
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/kd.2018.54
dc.identifier.eissn1309-1484
dc.identifier.endpage226
dc.identifier.issn1301-143X
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage223
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/16490
dc.identifier.volume31
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000464106200012
dc.language.isotr
dc.publisherAVES
dc.relation.ispartofKLIMIK JOURNAL
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectCarbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
dc.subjectcarbapenem inactivation test
dc.subjectmodified Hodge test
dc.subjectMULTIPLEX PCR
dc.subjectSPREAD
dc.subjectIDENTIFICATION
dc.subjectMedicine, General & Internal
dc.subjectMicrobiology
dc.subjectGeneral & Internal Medicine
dc.titleComparison of Carbapenem Inactivation Test and Modified Hodge Test in Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.trdizin3
rdl.citation.wos3
rdl.departmentERZİNCAN BİNALİ YILDIRIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.departmentİSTANBUL MEDENİYET ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.oa.statusopen
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN
rdl.wos.indexEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)