How safe are orthoroentgenograms in determining the amount of correction for varus deformities?

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Objectives: In this study, we evaluated the effects of the distance of the legs from the midline on alignment and angles of the lower extremities in orthoroentgenograms. Patients and methods: Between March 2012 and April 2013, 95 limbs of 56 patients with varus deformity who underwent orthoroentgenogram to identify the amount of joint laxity in two positions were included in this study. The initial X-ray was performed with the feet in contact, while the other was performed as the legs were abducted to be in line with the shoulders. For each orthoroentgenogram, the mean mechanical axis angle, anatomical axis, and joint line orientation angles were measured retrospectively. These measurements were repeated for 43 limbs with varus deformity > 10 degrees. Results: In the orthoroentgenograms with the feet in contact, the mean mechanical axis angle was 9.58 degrees +/- 5.7 degrees, (0.20 degrees; 26.0 degrees), the mean anatomical axis angle 3.65 degrees +/- 6.14 degrees, (-9.0 degrees; 21.0 degrees), and the mean joint line orientation angle -3.41 degrees +/- 2.52 degrees, (-12.0 degrees; 1.60 degrees). In the orthoroentgenograms with the legs abducted, the mean mechanical axis angle was 7.73 degrees +/- 5.58 degrees, (-3.0 degrees; 23.0 degrees), the mean anatomical axis angle 2.62 degrees +/- 5.87 degrees, (-11.0 degrees; 18.30 degrees), and mean joint line orientation angle was -2.44 degrees +/- 2.41 degrees, (-13.0 degrees; 3.0 degrees). The differences in the angles between the two positions were statistically significant (p < 0.005). Conclusion: Our study results showed that the mean values of mechanical axis angle, anatomical axis and the joint line orientation angle were higher in orthoroentgenograms with the feet in contact than the orthoroentgenograms with the legs abducted in patients with yarns gonarthrosis. We suggest that this may lead to mistakes in the preoperative planning. Ideal positions should be standardized to minimize possible problems.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/16520Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2014.06Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorGursu, Sarper
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Timur
dc.contributor.authorIssin, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorSofu, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Vedat
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:36:23.924605378Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:36:23.924605378Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractObjectives: In this study, we evaluated the effects of the distance of the legs from the midline on alignment and angles of the lower extremities in orthoroentgenograms. Patients and methods: Between March 2012 and April 2013, 95 limbs of 56 patients with varus deformity who underwent orthoroentgenogram to identify the amount of joint laxity in two positions were included in this study. The initial X-ray was performed with the feet in contact, while the other was performed as the legs were abducted to be in line with the shoulders. For each orthoroentgenogram, the mean mechanical axis angle, anatomical axis, and joint line orientation angles were measured retrospectively. These measurements were repeated for 43 limbs with varus deformity > 10 degrees. Results: In the orthoroentgenograms with the feet in contact, the mean mechanical axis angle was 9.58 degrees +/- 5.7 degrees, (0.20 degrees; 26.0 degrees), the mean anatomical axis angle 3.65 degrees +/- 6.14 degrees, (-9.0 degrees; 21.0 degrees), and the mean joint line orientation angle -3.41 degrees +/- 2.52 degrees, (-12.0 degrees; 1.60 degrees). In the orthoroentgenograms with the legs abducted, the mean mechanical axis angle was 7.73 degrees +/- 5.58 degrees, (-3.0 degrees; 23.0 degrees), the mean anatomical axis angle 2.62 degrees +/- 5.87 degrees, (-11.0 degrees; 18.30 degrees), and mean joint line orientation angle was -2.44 degrees +/- 2.41 degrees, (-13.0 degrees; 3.0 degrees). The differences in the angles between the two positions were statistically significant (p < 0.005). Conclusion: Our study results showed that the mean values of mechanical axis angle, anatomical axis and the joint line orientation angle were higher in orthoroentgenograms with the feet in contact than the orthoroentgenograms with the legs abducted in patients with yarns gonarthrosis. We suggest that this may lead to mistakes in the preoperative planning. Ideal positions should be standardized to minimize possible problems.
dc.identifier.doi10.5606/ehc.2014.06
dc.identifier.endpage29
dc.identifier.issn1305-8282
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid24650381
dc.identifier.startpage26
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/16520
dc.identifier.volume25
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000334479400006
dc.language.isotr
dc.publisherTURKISH JOINT DISEASES FOUNDATION
dc.relation.ispartofEKLEM HASTALIKLARI VE CERRAHISI-JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAcquired
dc.subjectbone malalignment
dc.subjectgenu varum
dc.subjectjoint deformity
dc.subjectLOWER-LIMB ALIGNMENT
dc.subjectLOWER-EXTREMITY
dc.subjectRADIOGRAPHS
dc.subjectOSTEOTOMY
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleHow safe are orthoroentgenograms in determining the amount of correction for varus deformities?
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.oa.statusgold
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)