Data-driven forecasting of photovoltaic performance with explainable artificial intelligence: Experimental validation using environmental and thermal predictors
Özet
PV systems meet energy demand, but environmental and operational factors affect their performance. This study used a three-scenario ablation framework to predict PV power from baseline meteorological and operational variables to under-panel temperature and finally to the full thermal configuration, including water temperature (a newly studied variable). Scenario 1 included time, air temperature, panel angle, relative humidity, and average wind speed; Scenario 2 added under-panel temperature; and Scenario 3 added water temperature. Direct thermal predictors were evaluated separately from meteorological inputs using this design. Four sophisticated ML algorithms, Random Forest (RF), CatBoost, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and one-dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (1D CNN), were refined by Randomized Search (RS) and evaluated using metrics. According to the first group of power prediction results under the full Scenario 3 configuration, the CatBoost-RS model demonstrated superior performance with RMSE = 10.61, MAE = 8.41, AIC = 222.22, KGE = 0.957, and R2 = 0.99. For the second group, the SVM-RS model outperformed others, achieving RMSE = 8.02, MAE = 5.50, AIC = 200.36, KGE = 0.994, and R2 = 0.992. Comparative analysis showed that CatBoost-RS was the most robust predictor, while RF exhibited proficiency in managing nonlinearity in this experimental setting. One-way ANOVA, paired t -test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, bootstrap confidence intervals, and effect size (Cohen’s d) analyses across both groups show that optimised ensemble and kernel-based models outperform the convolutional approach in predictive performance. Experimental validation and high predictive accuracy improve PV performance prediction in the proposed method. © 2026 Elsevier Ltd.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Tam Kayıt
| Alan | Değer | Dil |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Karakoyun, Yakup | |
| dc.contributor.author | Katipoğlu, Okan Mert | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dogan, Ahmet | |
| dc.contributor.author | Canbaz, Ali | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-18T20:25:25.586902966Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-18T20:25:25.586902966Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.description.abstract | PV systems meet energy demand, but environmental and operational factors affect their performance. This study used a three-scenario ablation framework to predict PV power from baseline meteorological and operational variables to under-panel temperature and finally to the full thermal configuration, including water temperature (a newly studied variable). Scenario 1 included time, air temperature, panel angle, relative humidity, and average wind speed; Scenario 2 added under-panel temperature; and Scenario 3 added water temperature. Direct thermal predictors were evaluated separately from meteorological inputs using this design. Four sophisticated ML algorithms, Random Forest (RF), CatBoost, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and one-dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (1D CNN), were refined by Randomized Search (RS) and evaluated using metrics. According to the first group of power prediction results under the full Scenario 3 configuration, the CatBoost-RS model demonstrated superior performance with RMSE = 10.61, MAE = 8.41, AIC = 222.22, KGE = 0.957, and R2 = 0.99. For the second group, the SVM-RS model outperformed others, achieving RMSE = 8.02, MAE = 5.50, AIC = 200.36, KGE = 0.994, and R2 = 0.992. Comparative analysis showed that CatBoost-RS was the most robust predictor, while RF exhibited proficiency in managing nonlinearity in this experimental setting. One-way ANOVA, paired t -test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, bootstrap confidence intervals, and effect size (Cohen’s d) analyses across both groups show that optimised ensemble and kernel-based models outperform the convolutional approach in predictive performance. Experimental validation and high predictive accuracy improve PV performance prediction in the proposed method. © 2026 Elsevier Ltd. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.enconman.2026.121734 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1879-2227 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0196-8904 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105040763847 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 121734 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10166 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 364 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001791220400001 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Energy Conversion and Management | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.subject | Machine Learning | |
| dc.subject | Regression Analysis | |
| dc.subject | SHAP | |
| dc.subject | Solar Energy Forecasting | |
| dc.subject | Sustainable Energy | |
| dc.subject | Atmospheric temperature | |
| dc.subject | Convolution | |
| dc.subject | Convolutional neural networks | |
| dc.subject | Forecasting | |
| dc.subject | Photovoltaics | |
| dc.subject | Random forests | |
| dc.subject | Solar energy | |
| dc.subject | Support vector regression | |
| dc.subject | Sustainable development | |
| dc.subject | Wind | |
| dc.subject | Energy forecasting | |
| dc.subject | Experimental validations | |
| dc.subject | Machine-learning | |
| dc.subject | Panel temperature | |
| dc.subject | Performance | |
| dc.subject | Randomized search | |
| dc.subject | Thermal | |
| dc.subject | Learning systems | |
| dc.title | Data-driven forecasting of photovoltaic performance with explainable artificial intelligence: Experimental validation using environmental and thermal predictors | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| rdl.citation.scopus | 0 | |
| rdl.citation.wos | 0 | |
| rdl.source.index | SCOPUS | |
| rdl.source.index | WOS | |
| rdl.wos.index | Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) |
