Data-driven forecasting of photovoltaic performance with explainable artificial intelligence: Experimental validation using environmental and thermal predictors

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

PV systems meet energy demand, but environmental and operational factors affect their performance. This study used a three-scenario ablation framework to predict PV power from baseline meteorological and operational variables to under-panel temperature and finally to the full thermal configuration, including water temperature (a newly studied variable). Scenario 1 included time, air temperature, panel angle, relative humidity, and average wind speed; Scenario 2 added under-panel temperature; and Scenario 3 added water temperature. Direct thermal predictors were evaluated separately from meteorological inputs using this design. Four sophisticated ML algorithms, Random Forest (RF), CatBoost, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and one-dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (1D CNN), were refined by Randomized Search (RS) and evaluated using metrics. According to the first group of power prediction results under the full Scenario 3 configuration, the CatBoost-RS model demonstrated superior performance with RMSE = 10.61, MAE = 8.41, AIC = 222.22, KGE = 0.957, and R2 = 0.99. For the second group, the SVM-RS model outperformed others, achieving RMSE = 8.02, MAE = 5.50, AIC = 200.36, KGE = 0.994, and R2 = 0.992. Comparative analysis showed that CatBoost-RS was the most robust predictor, while RF exhibited proficiency in managing nonlinearity in this experimental setting. One-way ANOVA, paired t -test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, bootstrap confidence intervals, and effect size (Cohen’s d) analyses across both groups show that optimised ensemble and kernel-based models outperform the convolutional approach in predictive performance. Experimental validation and high predictive accuracy improve PV performance prediction in the proposed method. © 2026 Elsevier Ltd.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10166Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKarakoyun, Yakup
dc.contributor.authorKatipoğlu, Okan Mert
dc.contributor.authorDogan, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorCanbaz, Ali
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:25:25.586902966Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:25:25.586902966Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractPV systems meet energy demand, but environmental and operational factors affect their performance. This study used a three-scenario ablation framework to predict PV power from baseline meteorological and operational variables to under-panel temperature and finally to the full thermal configuration, including water temperature (a newly studied variable). Scenario 1 included time, air temperature, panel angle, relative humidity, and average wind speed; Scenario 2 added under-panel temperature; and Scenario 3 added water temperature. Direct thermal predictors were evaluated separately from meteorological inputs using this design. Four sophisticated ML algorithms, Random Forest (RF), CatBoost, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and one-dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (1D CNN), were refined by Randomized Search (RS) and evaluated using metrics. According to the first group of power prediction results under the full Scenario 3 configuration, the CatBoost-RS model demonstrated superior performance with RMSE = 10.61, MAE = 8.41, AIC = 222.22, KGE = 0.957, and R2 = 0.99. For the second group, the SVM-RS model outperformed others, achieving RMSE = 8.02, MAE = 5.50, AIC = 200.36, KGE = 0.994, and R2 = 0.992. Comparative analysis showed that CatBoost-RS was the most robust predictor, while RF exhibited proficiency in managing nonlinearity in this experimental setting. One-way ANOVA, paired t -test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, bootstrap confidence intervals, and effect size (Cohen’s d) analyses across both groups show that optimised ensemble and kernel-based models outperform the convolutional approach in predictive performance. Experimental validation and high predictive accuracy improve PV performance prediction in the proposed method. © 2026 Elsevier Ltd.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enconman.2026.121734
dc.identifier.eissn1879-2227
dc.identifier.issn0196-8904
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105040763847
dc.identifier.startpage121734
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/10166
dc.identifier.volume364
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001791220400001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy Conversion and Management
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectMachine Learning
dc.subjectRegression Analysis
dc.subjectSHAP
dc.subjectSolar Energy Forecasting
dc.subjectSustainable Energy
dc.subjectAtmospheric temperature
dc.subjectConvolution
dc.subjectConvolutional neural networks
dc.subjectForecasting
dc.subjectPhotovoltaics
dc.subjectRandom forests
dc.subjectSolar energy
dc.subjectSupport vector regression
dc.subjectSustainable development
dc.subjectWind
dc.subjectEnergy forecasting
dc.subjectExperimental validations
dc.subjectMachine-learning
dc.subjectPanel temperature
dc.subjectPerformance
dc.subjectRandomized search
dc.subjectThermal
dc.subjectLearning systems
dc.titleData-driven forecasting of photovoltaic performance with explainable artificial intelligence: Experimental validation using environmental and thermal predictors
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus0
rdl.citation.wos0
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)