Diagnostic errors in computed tomography outsourcing: Analysis of a single center

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

Aim: The reporting of medical imaging with outsourcing is used by many hospitals in Turkey. The aim of this study was to evaluateoutsourced computed tomography (CT) reports and determine any errors made.Material and Methods: The study was planned with a prospective design. The reports of the CT tests taken during 2017 by anoutsourced company of 35 randomly selected patients were compared. In the comparison, findings which could lead to a change indiagnosis and treatment were labelled as “significant” and findings which would not lead to a change in diagnosis and treatment werelabelled as “non-significant”. Findings reported in the study comparison but not mentioned or written incorrectly in the outsourcedcompany report were classified as “absence” and any finding that was written but not present was labelled as “extra”.Results: The study included the examsimages and reports of 35 patients, comprising 18 (51.4%) males and 17 (48.6%) females witha mean age of 49.37± 23.66 years. A major error was found in 27 (77%) cases. No statistically significant difference was determinedin the significant, non-significant, absent and extra data according to patient age (p>0.05).Conclusion: There should be an implementation of regulations for clinicians to be able to re-use the diagnostic algorithm. Residentialemployment of radiologists should be encouraged rather than outsourcing.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/19997Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorKaravaş, Erdal
dc.contributor.authorhirik, erkan
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T21:11:57.722216293Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T21:11:57.722216293Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractAim: The reporting of medical imaging with outsourcing is used by many hospitals in Turkey. The aim of this study was to evaluateoutsourced computed tomography (CT) reports and determine any errors made.Material and Methods: The study was planned with a prospective design. The reports of the CT tests taken during 2017 by anoutsourced company of 35 randomly selected patients were compared. In the comparison, findings which could lead to a change indiagnosis and treatment were labelled as “significant” and findings which would not lead to a change in diagnosis and treatment werelabelled as “non-significant”. Findings reported in the study comparison but not mentioned or written incorrectly in the outsourcedcompany report were classified as “absence” and any finding that was written but not present was labelled as “extra”.Results: The study included the examsimages and reports of 35 patients, comprising 18 (51.4%) males and 17 (48.6%) females witha mean age of 49.37± 23.66 years. A major error was found in 27 (77%) cases. No statistically significant difference was determinedin the significant, non-significant, absent and extra data according to patient age (p>0.05).Conclusion: There should be an implementation of regulations for clinicians to be able to re-use the diagnostic algorithm. Residentialemployment of radiologists should be encouraged rather than outsourcing.
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.03.150
dc.identifier.eissn2636-7688
dc.identifier.endpage972
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.startpage968
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/19997
dc.identifier.volume26
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Medical Research
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectTıbbi İnformatik
dc.subjectRadyoloji
dc.subjectNükleer Tıp
dc.subjectTıbbi Görüntüleme
dc.titleDiagnostic errors in computed tomography outsourcing: Analysis of a single center
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.trdizin1
rdl.departmentERZİNCAN BİNALİ YILDIRIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ
rdl.source.indexTRDIZIN