A Comparative Analysis of Exhaust Gas Temperature Based on Machine Learning Models for Aviation Applications

ArticleAçık Erişim

Özet

The main objective of this study is to investigate elaborately the relationship between exhaust gas temperature (EGT) and various operational parameters specific to aero-engine for the cruise phase. EGT prediction is performed based on different models, including deep learning (DL) and support vector machine (SVM), using a set of historical flight data, more than 1300. In order to achieve this goal, the EGT is taken as the output parameter while the most key variables for the EGT prediction are taken as the input parameters to the models. Several statistical goodness tests, namely root-mean-square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R2), are conducted to make a fair comparison between the efficiency and performance of each model that is developed based on Matrix Laboratory (matlab) and R code. The relative importance for the altitude (ALT) parameter of 11.89% has the highest value while the lowest relatively importance parameter is vibration (VIB) of 5.00%. EGT variation for the actual data is in the range of 459.05 and 607.32 °C. It is observed that the EGT variation of DL and SVM ranges from 457.09 to 604.52 and from 454.64 to 603.23 °C, respectively. Furthermore, the prediction error for DL and SVM fluctuates between a minimum of -21.61 to a maximum of 22.50 °C and a minimum of -13.34 to a maximum of 12.44 °C, respectively. In the light of the statistical test results, it is concluded that the DL model with RMSE of 4.3922, MAE of 3.3981, and R2 of 0.9834 shows more excellent ability in predicting EGT than the SVM model with RMSE of 5.5212, MAE of 4.0527, and R2 of 0.9712. This study may effectively be applied to different aircraft types as a useful roadmap for academic and industrial researchers in this sort of application and it shed the light on optimizing performance for a specific aircraft by thermodynamic methods. © 2021 by ASME.

Anahtar Kelimeler

RDL Kalıcı Bağlantı (PID)
https://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12907Resmi atıflarda kullanılan kalıcı adres
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052771Yayıncı resmi DOI adresi
Tam Kayıt
AlanDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorAtasoy, Vehbi Emrah
dc.contributor.authorSuzer, Ahmet Esat
dc.contributor.authorEkici, Selcuk
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-18T20:27:45.888742306Z
dc.date.available2026-10-18T20:27:45.888742306Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractThe main objective of this study is to investigate elaborately the relationship between exhaust gas temperature (EGT) and various operational parameters specific to aero-engine for the cruise phase. EGT prediction is performed based on different models, including deep learning (DL) and support vector machine (SVM), using a set of historical flight data, more than 1300. In order to achieve this goal, the EGT is taken as the output parameter while the most key variables for the EGT prediction are taken as the input parameters to the models. Several statistical goodness tests, namely root-mean-square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R2), are conducted to make a fair comparison between the efficiency and performance of each model that is developed based on Matrix Laboratory (matlab) and R code. The relative importance for the altitude (ALT) parameter of 11.89% has the highest value while the lowest relatively importance parameter is vibration (VIB) of 5.00%. EGT variation for the actual data is in the range of 459.05 and 607.32 °C. It is observed that the EGT variation of DL and SVM ranges from 457.09 to 604.52 and from 454.64 to 603.23 °C, respectively. Furthermore, the prediction error for DL and SVM fluctuates between a minimum of -21.61 to a maximum of 22.50 °C and a minimum of -13.34 to a maximum of 12.44 °C, respectively. In the light of the statistical test results, it is concluded that the DL model with RMSE of 4.3922, MAE of 3.3981, and R2 of 0.9834 shows more excellent ability in predicting EGT than the SVM model with RMSE of 5.5212, MAE of 4.0527, and R2 of 0.9712. This study may effectively be applied to different aircraft types as a useful roadmap for academic and industrial researchers in this sort of application and it shed the light on optimizing performance for a specific aircraft by thermodynamic methods. © 2021 by ASME.
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4052771
dc.identifier.eissn1528-8994
dc.identifier.issn0195-0738
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85119418001
dc.identifier.startpage082101
dc.identifier.urihttps://rdlopen.rawdatalibrary.net/r/ebyu/12907
dc.identifier.volume144
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000818095500028
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Energy Resources Technology, Transactions of the ASME
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectaero-engine
dc.subjectenergy systems analysis
dc.subjectExhaust gas temperature
dc.subjectfuel consumption
dc.subjectlearning algorithm
dc.subjectonboard-recorded flight data
dc.subjectoperational parameter
dc.subjectprediction
dc.subjectAircraft engines
dc.subjectDeep learning
dc.subjectEngines
dc.subjectErrors
dc.subjectGases
dc.subjectLearning algorithms
dc.subjectMean square error
dc.subjectSupport vector machines
dc.subjectSystems analysis
dc.subjectExhaust gas temperatures
dc.subjectFlight data
dc.subjectLearning vectors
dc.subjectMean absolute error
dc.subjectOperational parameters
dc.subjectRoot mean square errors
dc.subjectSupport vectors machine
dc.subjectForecasting
dc.titleA Comparative Analysis of Exhaust Gas Temperature Based on Machine Learning Models for Aviation Applications
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
rdl.citation.scopus44
rdl.citation.wos38
rdl.source.indexSCOPUS
rdl.source.indexWOS
rdl.wos.indexScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)